A strong thesis statement is a crucial element of a research paper as it helps to guide the focus of the paper and provide a structure for the arguments being made. It should be clear, concise, and specific, and it should provide the reader with a sense of the direction the paper will take.
One key characteristic of a strong thesis statement is that it is specific. It should not be too broad or vague, but rather should be focused on a specific argument or point that the paper will explore in depth. This helps to keep the paper on track and ensures that the reader knows exactly what to expect from the paper.
Another important aspect of a strong thesis statement is that it is debatable. It should present a position or argument that can be supported with evidence and that is open to being challenged or debated by others. This allows the research paper to engage with the broader academic conversation and contribute to the ongoing discussion in the field.
Finally, a strong thesis statement should be concise and to the point. It should be expressed in a single sentence, or at most a few sentences, and should not be unnecessarily long or complex. This helps to ensure that the reader can easily understand the main argument being made and that the paper is well-organized and easy to follow.
In summary, a strong thesis statement is an essential element of a research paper as it helps to guide the focus of the paper and provide a structure for the arguments being made. It should be specific, debatable, and concise, and it should clearly express the main argument or point being made in the paper.
Twelve Angry Men: Summary & Analysis
Henry Fonda Juror 8 entered the trial with an open mind, he managed to convince the others to do the same. Literature and Culture You are watching the news and shocked by the murders, abuse of children, acts or racism, and treatment of those with disabilities. For them, the movie will fall on blind eyes. Two and Five change their votes back to guilty. The most obvious reason that this movie works is because of the stellar performances by Henry Fonda, Lee J. He received an Emmy for the play, which was later adapted into an Oscar nominated feature-length film, as well as into the script for a live stage version. The jurors do another round of voting.
Evidence Analysis Chart for Twelve Angry blog.sigma-systems.com
But the idea that somebody would stand up for the rights of a young man with a violent past who was a minority, was something new in mainstream Hollywood. Juror Eight responds by asking to see the knife again—the Foreman looks at him questioningly before talking to the guard. This effectively eliminates the phenomena of groupthink. There are gasps and a long silence. In Act II Juror 3 says to Juror 5, What's the matter with you? We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. His 1954 teleplay Twelve Angry Men established his name in the literary world, and is his most famous work.
Twelve Angry Men Act 1 Summary & Analysis
Three wonders why the old man would lie and Nine points out the quietness and poverty of the man. Is Eight being contrary for the sake of doing so? After a brief argument, 8th Juror brings into question whether or not the downstairs neighbor, an old man who had suffered a stroke and could only walk slowly, could have gotten to the door to see the boy run down the stairs in fifteen seconds, as he had testified. Thoughtful the impact of imbalances at intervals circle forces all parties to first identify and diagnose the source of conflict, and then parley for resolution. He is neither open nor receptive. Eight says he feels it is possible that someone else killed the father with a similar weapon to the one the boy purchased.
Analysis of 12 Angry Men
They take a break. The first vote yields eleven guilty votes and one not guilty vote. Reginald Rose was born in 1920 in Manhattan and spent his youth, high school, college years, and adult life in New York City. He is less concerned and less committed in this murder case. Secondly, it allows him to vent his frustrations. Following details were revealed. Two raises something that has been bothering him about the case.
Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose Plot Summary
The stab wound appears to have been made downward from above, as if the attacker was taller than the victim. Three is furious and accuses Eight of acting out of sympathy for the kid. Such as hierarchy versus dignity, opinions versus understanding, truth versus doubt, rationality versus emotion, passion versus calm, perseverance versus blind obedience, law versus ethics, these are the behavior that we should think carefully what we want to be in any society. Peer is a force that can bring out the best and worst of humanity. Years later, the Foreman says, the man was discovered to be guilty, after all.
Analysis of the Movie "Twelve Angry Men" (1957)
The preliminary vote shows that many of the jurors at this point are not interested in deliberating at length. The faulty evidence wasnt enough to take him to the death penalty. What was even more important was the fact that Henry Fonda stood up for the boy by pointing out the ageism and most importantly, racism of one half of the jurors and the apathy towards their responsibility of the other half. Juror Three, acting the contrarian, responds that he feels fine. According to Johnson 2007 , creating dialogue is a vital step to creating effective and ethical community groups.
Twelve Angry Men Study Guide
The Foreman continues that his friend served on a jury where they found the defendant not guilty, but later learned that he really did the murder. Because of his different opinions with others, the jury is able to make judgments carefully and correctly. Maltin, 145 The criteria for the viewer may be different but all of the abovementioned movies, or rather films, specifically 12 Angry Men, serve to portray a message that is timeless. While the work may be fiction, we are able to examine the events of the story and question our own actions or those of our society. Act II resumes in the same moment we left off with in Act I.
