A constitution for the few. Constitution for Few 2022-12-16
A constitution for the few Rating:
9,3/10
1091
reviews
A constitution is a set of laws and principles that outlines the powers and duties of a government and establishes the rights and freedoms of its citizens. It is meant to be a foundational document that serves as a guiding light for the functioning of a state and ensures that its actions are in line with the values and principles of a society.
However, when a constitution is designed and implemented solely for the benefit of the few, rather than the general welfare of the society as a whole, it can have far-reaching and detrimental consequences. Such a constitution may be created and maintained by a small group of elites who seek to maintain their power and privilege at the expense of the majority.
In a system where the constitution is designed for the few, the rights and freedoms of the majority may be severely curtailed. The government may be empowered to take actions that benefit the elites at the expense of the general population, such as enacting policies that favor the interests of large corporations over those of ordinary citizens. The judicial system may also be biased in favor of the elites, providing them with legal protections and privileges that are not afforded to the rest of society.
Furthermore, a constitution for the few may lead to a lack of representation and accountability in government. The elites may use their power and influence to stack the deck in their favor, ensuring that they have a disproportionate amount of control over the decision-making process. This can lead to a lack of transparency and accountability, as the government may be more responsive to the interests of the elites rather than those of the general population.
In order to prevent a constitution from becoming a tool for the benefit of the few, it is essential that it be designed with the interests of the general population in mind. This can be achieved through a number of measures, such as the inclusion of checks and balances to prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals or groups, and the establishment of a system of representation that ensures that all voices are heard and taken into account. Additionally, it is important to ensure that the judicial system is impartial and that the rights and freedoms of all citizens are protected and upheld.
In conclusion, a constitution that is designed and implemented for the benefit of the few can have far-reaching and detrimental consequences for a society. It is essential that a constitution be designed with the interests of the general population in mind, and that it include measures to ensure transparency, accountability, and the protection of the rights and freedoms of all citizens.
An Analysis of Michael Parenti's Constitution for a Few
The majority of them being merchants, it is for their interest to establish the credit of the United States in Europe on a solid foundation by the exact payment of debts, and to grant to Congress powers extensive enough to compel the people to contribute for this purpose. Remember to create an outline to use in the creation of your thesis. That is exactly the point: high-mindedness is a common attribute among people even when, or especially when, they are pursuing their personal and class interests. Most persons believe in their own virtue. It guaranteed a republican form of government and explicitly repudiated monarchy and aristocracy; hence, Article I, Section 9 states: "No title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States. It is unfortunate, but inevitable.
A Constitution For The Few : Michael Parenti : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
What is more, the Constitution never was submitted to a popular vote. Join Essayworld today to view this entire essay and over 50,000 other term papers were not greedy, elitist, slave-beating, parasites. The Soulbury Constitution was introduced in 1945 and Sri Lanka, then Ceylon, was granted independence under that Constitution in 1948. Hamilton was one of America's negatives. Yet few dared venture in that direction out of fear of popular opposition.
A Constitution for the country or a few individuals?
The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines it as the basic principles and laws of a nation, state, or social group that determine the powers and duties of the government and guarantee certain rights to the people in it. As one Christian theologian conceded, "The men who. Almost all of them dread the efforts of the people to despoil them of their possessions, and, moreover, they are creditors, and therefore interested in strengthening the government and watching over the execution of the law. The propertyless majority, as Madison pointed out in Federalist No. Domestic violence perpetrated by male members of households should attract serious punitive measures as preventive measures, and these need to be enshrined in law The areas more in the limelight are issues like political devolution, and self-determination for sections of the society.
. People's sovereigntyIn addition to this major issue, there is also a question mark as to whether Parliament actually exercises people's sovereignty. And salaries were provided for all officials, thus rejecting the common practice of treating public office as a voluntary service that only the rich could afford. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society" and "the first object of government" is "the protection of different and unequal faculties of acquiring property. I In twelve of the thirteen states Pennsylvania excepted , only propertyowning White males could vote, probably not more than 10 percent of the total adult population. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society" and "the first object of government" is "the protection of different and unequal faculties of acquiring property" that is, acquiring wealth.
Though, the king did have to exercise this power with care and after consulting with his advisers Wikipedia. Want to read the rest of this paper? Unknown to and without any approval from the President, the Prime Minister entered into a peace accord with the LTTE leader Prabakaran. The Parliament too was not consulted and approval obtained for this. The first are the rich and the wellborn, the other the mass of the people. The specter of Shays's Rebellion hovered over the delegates who gathered in Philadelphia three months later, confirming their worst fears. In its place, one could have more and more administrative devolution as that will matter more for people when it comes to their day to day lives.
Critical Evaluation of “A Constitution for the Few: Looking Back to the Beginning”
Ironically, the female population in Sri Lanka in fact is the majority population almost 52% , yet, the country is dominated by the male population as seen by the fact that there are only 12 female parliamentarians out of the total 225 in the newly elected Parliament. Some of the delegates were land speculators who invested in western holdings. It was decided that seats in the House would be allocated among the states according to population; while each state, regardless of population, would have two seats in the Senate. When George Mason of Virginia recommended that a committee be formed to draft "a Bill of Rights," a task that could be accomplished "in a few hours," the other convention members offered little discussion on the motion and voted almost unanimously against it. McKinley, The Suffrage Franchise in the Thirteen English Colonies in America Philadelphia: B. Also outlawed were ex post facto laws, the practice of declaring some act to be a crime, then punishing those who had committed it before it was made unlawful.
The Supreme Court was to be elected by no one, its justices being appointed to life tenure by the president, with confirmation by the Senate. So Morris gave up 'state rights' for 'nationalism' without hesitation. A member of the New Jersey legislature had to be worth at least 1,000 pounds. Its main function has been to create artificial majorities out of slim pluralities. While some may argue otherwise, it is difficult to see how it enhanced and perpetuated the power of the Prime Minister who already enjoyed executive power, although answerable to the Parliament. How should the executive be selected? Since the enactment of the 1978 Constitution there have been 19 Amendments to it, with the 20th now tabled in Parliament. What was at stake for Hamilton, Livingston, and their opponents, was more than speculative windfalls in securities; it was the question, what kind of society would emerge from the revolution when the dust had settled, and on which class the political center of gravity would come to rest.
Even Forrest McDonald, a conservative critic of Beard's interpretation, documents the opulent background of fifty-three of the fifty-five delegates; see his We, the People: The Economic Origins of the Constitution Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958 , chapter 2. Vice-President Al Gore won the popular vote by some 300,000 ballots, but Texas governor George W. The 18th Amendment did away with the term limits specified earlier maximum of two terms to any individual , and some of its other provisions reverted considerable powers that were modified in the 17th Amendment. The monarch was seen as the supreme ruler of the areas they ruled. A highly dubious count of votes in Florida tilted the electoral college to Bush, and when that count was challenged in the courts, the Republican-controlled Florida legislature declared its intent to brush aside all challenges and summarily accept the list of pro-Bush electors that the Florida secretary of state, an active member of the Bush campaign, had certified as the winning slate.
