Arguements for animal testing. Arguments For and Against Animal Testing in the US 2022-12-25

Arguements for animal testing Rating: 9,3/10 1560 reviews

Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, refers to the use of animals in scientific and medical research, product testing, and education. The practice has been a source of controversy for decades, with some arguing that it is necessary for the advancement of science and medicine, while others believe it is unethical and unnecessary. In this essay, we will examine some of the arguments for animal testing.

One of the main arguments in favor of animal testing is that it has contributed significantly to the development of new drugs, treatments, and therapies that have saved countless lives. For example, animal testing has played a crucial role in the development of vaccines for diseases such as polio, measles, and influenza, as well as the development of treatments for cancer, heart disease, and other life-threatening conditions. Without the use of animal models, it would be much more difficult, if not impossible, to study the safety and effectiveness of these treatments and to understand how they work.

Another argument for animal testing is that it allows scientists to study complex biological processes that cannot be easily studied in other ways. For example, it is often difficult to study the effects of a particular drug on the human body, as there are many factors that can influence the results. By using animals as test subjects, scientists can better control for these variables and study the effects of a drug more accurately. Additionally, animal models can help scientists understand the underlying mechanisms of diseases, which can help to identify potential therapeutic targets and develop new treatments.

A third argument for animal testing is that it is strictly regulated and subject to strict guidelines to ensure the welfare of the animals involved. In the United States, for example, the Animal Welfare Act requires that researchers follow specific guidelines for the care and use of animals in research, including provisions for housing, nutrition, and veterinary care. Additionally, many research institutions have their own animal care and use committees that review and approve all animal research proposals to ensure that they are ethically and scientifically sound.

Despite these arguments, animal testing remains a controversial practice, and there are those who argue that it is unnecessary and unethical. Some critics argue that there are alternative methods, such as in vitro or computer modeling, that can be used to study the effects of drugs and diseases without the need for animal testing. Others argue that the suffering and death of animals for the benefit of humans is wrong, regardless of the potential benefits.

In conclusion, animal testing has played a significant role in the development of new drugs and treatments and in the understanding of complex biological processes. While it is strictly regulated and subject to guidelines to ensure the welfare of the animals involved, it remains a controversial practice and is opposed by those who believe that it is unnecessary and unethical. Ultimately, the decision to use animals in research is a complex one that requires a balancing of the potential benefits with ethical considerations.

Animal Testing Arguments

arguements for animal testing

Ineffective results Some drugs and products are harmful to animals but beneficial to humans. It is important to replace animals with more advanced test methods because animals are ineffective and expensive test subjects Kojima et al. Animal testing requires plenty of workforce and expensive equipment, leading to spending billions of dollars each year in this field. The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there. While experiments on animals have been conducted during the course of some discoveries, this does not mean that animals were vital to the discovery or are predictive of human health outcomes or that the same discoveries would not have been made without using animals. Another important thing for the opponents of animal is the high cost of tests, some animals test take several years to conduct and analyze, the cost of these tests are expensive and sometimes millions of dollars spent for a test.

Next

Arguments For Animal Testing

arguements for animal testing

However, there is a growing controversy behind the morality of certain types of testing; especially on animals. The useage of animals Why Should Animal Testing Be Allowed To Continue 1288 Words 6 Pages Every year over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused. Both scientists conducted medical experiments on live animals. These groups advocate for alternative testing methods to prohibit animal testing. An animal testing argumentative essay always mentions the benefit of reducing the number of errors and fatal mistakes owing to a round of tests on animals.

Next

Top 10 Reasons Why Animal Testing is Necessary

arguements for animal testing

Nonetheless, animal research should be carried out as its advantages are more significant than the disadvantages. Unfortunately, many people do not know this and continue to support animal testing. This percentage is proof of how much animal experimentation has increased in the last 15 years. Animals, Disease, and Human Society: Human-Animal Relations and the Rise of Veterinary Medicine. If the tests are successful, further tests are done on monkeys before using human beings. Demand for cruelty-free products Cruelty-free products are becoming very popular. Scientist use animals purposely for medical treatment, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses Animal Testing, 4.

Next

Animal Testing Pros and Cons: Arguments For & Against It

arguements for animal testing

I researched on animal experimentation and found it heart-wrenching. Additionally, it would be even more cruel to test on humans as well as more expensive. They have not only been a great form of companionship for people, but have also helped with the success in the world of medicine. Animals cannot defend themselves against abuse in scientific investigations. No experiment, no matter how painful or trivial, is prohibited—and painkillers are not even required.

Next

Animal Testing: Arguments For

arguements for animal testing

One of the respondents who works with primates, the most contentious area of research said that when he has allowed lay-people to tour his laboratory to see how his work is conducted approximately 98% of visitors leave understanding the importance of his work and that it is conducted in line with the very highest of ethics. The suffering of the animals used in these experiments is seen as pointless and a waste of time and money. They further argue that the advancement of understanding in areas such as energy metabolism, memory, and brain function, as well as the development of autoimmune disease was made possible by animal testing Rocklinsberg et al. However, we simply do not have alternative methods of testing. Animal experiments have not only impacted the history of human beings but are currently still providing many advancements in medicine. Various scientists determined to improve the field of medicine conduct medical experiments using specific animals like rats or monkeys to develop an in-depth understanding of pathology and pharmacology effect of the drugs. Those who are against animal testing argued that animals have the right to live peacefully.

Next

The Arguments for and Against Animal Testing

arguements for animal testing

Examples of alternatives include human cells and tissues, computer simulation programs, as well as human volunteers Kojima et al. These breakthroughs in veterinary medicine can contribute for longer and healthier lives of pets and many other animals The downside of animal testing is what animal testing opponents claim as the cruelty inflicted on animals during research but this too is already being taken care of. In the latter, animals are used for the development of medical treatments, the safety of products, other biomedical, and health care use. It had been tested on animals first. Animal testing has made a huge impact on our daily lives and will affect our future to come. Furthermore, animals clearly do not feel the same way as humans, and scientists are careful to minimize stress in the animals, since this would damage their research.

Next

Arguments against animal testing

arguements for animal testing

By using animals in research and experiments, medical researchers will be able to determine the safety and effectiveness of medicines and other products without risking the lives and safety of human subjects. From being injected with unsafe chemicals to being locked inside of small cages, what these animals experience in these facilities is completely unethical. While humans now enjoy a longer and healthier life than at any other time in history there are still genetic diseases or other scourges such as dementia or cancer that The research into possible treatments involves potentially very dangerous substances with unknown side effects and some of the research requires the manipulation of genes. One such examples of these atrocities is that of a study including a marmoset monkey. The fact is that no matter how many trails are done there will always be a first Opposing Arguments Against Animal Testing 748 Words 3 Pages According to my research, animals has been in used for scientific testing early as 500 B.


Next

Animal Testing Ban: Counterargument and Rebuttal

arguements for animal testing

This application has been widely carried out in many industries. With such highly inaccurate results, putting animals through such torture seems wasteful. The following are common statements supporting animal experimentation followed by the arguments against them. Those who are against animal testing argue that the use of animals for research and experiment characterizes an unnecessary and pitiless form of cruelty to animals. Statistics released by the National Institute of Health NIH revealed that about 95 percent of drugs tested on animals and verified as safe for use on humans usually fail during trials. Recent developments in government regulations have also dealt with the problem on issues of cruelty on laboratory animals. Animal Testing Controversy 1632 Words 7 Pages There is much controversy with regards to animal testing for medical research and there has been throughout the centuries.

Next