Asymmetric bicameralism. Asymmetric federalism 2023-01-01

Asymmetric bicameralism Rating: 7,6/10 1622 reviews

Asymmetric bicameralism is a form of government in which two legislative chambers or houses have different powers, responsibilities, or compositions. This system is often used in federal systems, where one house represents the states or regions, and the other represents the population as a whole.

One example of asymmetric bicameralism can be found in the United States, where the Senate and the House of Representatives have different powers and responsibilities. The Senate is made up of two senators from each state, regardless of population, while the House of Representatives is based on population, with each state receiving a certain number of representatives based on its population. The Senate is considered to be the more powerful of the two houses, as it has the power to approve or reject nominations for federal judges and executive branch officials, and it must approve any legislation before it becomes law.

Another example of asymmetric bicameralism can be found in the Australian federal system, where the Senate and the House of Representatives also have different powers and responsibilities. The Senate represents the states and territories, while the House of Representatives represents the population as a whole. The Senate has the power to block or amend legislation, while the House of Representatives has the power to initiate legislation.

Asymmetric bicameralism can also be found in other countries, such as Canada, India, and Germany. In each of these countries, the two houses have different powers and responsibilities, and often represent different interests within the country.

There are both advantages and disadvantages to asymmetric bicameralism. One advantage is that it allows for a more diverse representation of interests within the government, as each house represents different groups or regions. This can help to prevent the domination of one group or region over others. It also allows for a system of checks and balances, as one house can block or amend legislation proposed by the other.

However, asymmetric bicameralism can also lead to delays and stalemates in the legislative process, as each house must agree on legislation before it can become law. It can also be more difficult for the general public to understand the different powers and responsibilities of each house, which can lead to confusion and frustration.

Overall, asymmetric bicameralism is a form of government that allows for a diverse representation of interests and a system of checks and balances, but it can also lead to delays and confusion in the legislative process.

Federalism, bicameralism, and institutional change: general trends and one case

asymmetric bicameralism

These cases suggest that bicameralism alone is not a sufficient condition to impede institutional change. Therefore, it is important that the system includes mechanisms for conflict resolution. The new constitution draft proposes to deliver on this demand, supplying new powers to regions, communes and indigenous territories. Carey, Presidents and Assemblies. Retrieved 19 February 2018.

Next

Comparative politics ID terms Flashcards

asymmetric bicameralism

In symmetrical bicameralism, both the upper house and the lower house have about the same amount of power. Russell, Reforming the House of Lords. Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis, Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth. The growing awareness of the complexity of the notion of representation and the multi-functional nature of modern legislatures may be affording incipient new rationales for second chambers, though these do generally remain contested institutions in ways that first chambers are not. Whatever legislation, if any, the conference committee finalizes is presented in an unamendable "take-it-or-leave-it" manner by both chambers.


Next

Bicameralism

asymmetric bicameralism

Retrieved 10 September 2019. Especially in parliamentary systems, in which the cabinet is responsible for the parliament, ensuring that the cabinet is responsible to one chamber is critical. It is possible to argue that in isolation these institutions have a systematic impact on institutional stability; but it is equally possible to argue that this result occurs only when they are combined Pierson 1995; Ragin 1987. There are variations in size, term of office, turnover, membership, representation, and institutional power. The British The most frequently employed method of selecting upper house membership is direct election, in whole or in part, by a country's citizens. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave, 2001. Retrieved 9 September 2014.

Next

Asymmetric federalism

asymmetric bicameralism

We shall return to this topic in the next section, where the features of these systems are presented in detail. The upper house varies more broadly in the way in which members are selected, including inheritance, appointment by various bodies, and direct and indirect elections. In few states Amapá, Sergipe and São Paulo , this rate is smaller or equal to 30 percent of the votes. The seven least-populous states—Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming—have only one representative each. The bicameral system in the U.


Next

ID List Week 5

asymmetric bicameralism

A strong Senate is not, however, a sufficient condition to inhibit constitutional change. New world and European experiences, ed. The size, term of office, and method of election directly elected, indirectly elected, appointed, or other for each chamber of a bicameral system will vary by country. They are expected to be especially rare in federal states. There are no cases in which the lower house has the ultimate decision, but cases where the ultimate decision relies on the chamber where the bill was introduced Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Dominican Republic and Mexico. An example of this is the President's veto power.

Next

Bicameral System: What It Is, How It Works, History in U.S.

asymmetric bicameralism

Houndmills, UK: Macmillan Press Ltd. Except for this one issue area, electoral reform, the remaining CAPs that had been rejected by the Senate consisted of proposals that had already been approved by the Chamber of Deputies. The concession system might be kept, or might be replaced by revocable permits—and these rules could change as successive legislatures enact different laws, adding uncertainty. This is the measure of the number of parties that win SEATS when sovereignty is constitutionally split between at least two territorial levels, so that independent government units at each level have final authority in at least one policy realm Devolution decentralization is the extent to which actual policymaking power lies with the central or regional governments. Cambbridge: Cambridge University Press. German jurisprudence doesn't recognise the Bundesrat as a parliament chamber, because it consists of members of the state governments.

Next

POLS CHP 13 Flashcards

asymmetric bicameralism

Comparative Government and Politics. Retrieved 7 September 2020. However, there is no systematic relationship between federalism, per se, and constitutional stability. The cabinet cannot be responsible to two chambers. By contrast, stability is more likely to be found in a political institution often encountered in federal states: bicameralism.

Next

Chile’s Proposed Constitution: 7 Key Points

asymmetric bicameralism

Tsebelis and Money, Bicameralism, pp. The previously examined constitutional amendments fulfill the first condition, because their dependent variable is legislation considered in central decision-making arenas. With a second Chamber that wields veto power it is possible to approve changes to the status quo, therefore devising democratic solutions for national policy conflicts. Retrieved 23 June 2014. Observe the world- test hypothesis and its implications to falsify, compare to other models. The Senate is described more often than not as the legislative body where subnational elites are entitled to protect constituent unit rights and block changes that may impinge upon subnational rights. Considering that in the Italian Republic the Government needs to win confidence votes in both the chambers, it may happen that a Government has a strong majority usually in the Chamber of Deputies and a weak one or no majority at all in the Senate.

Next