Avi shlaim war and peace in the middle east. Summary Avi Slaim 2022-12-11
Avi shlaim war and peace in the middle east Rating:
8,4/10
1683
reviews
Avi Shlaim is a renowned historian and professor at the University of Oxford, known for his expertise on the Middle East and particularly for his critical analysis of the Israeli-Arab conflict. In his book "War and Peace in the Middle East," Shlaim delves into the complex and tumultuous history of the region, examining the root causes of the conflicts that have plagued the Middle East for decades.
One of the main themes of Shlaim's book is the role of outside powers in shaping the course of events in the Middle East. He argues that the major powers, including the United States and the Soviet Union, have often played a destabilizing role in the region, either through their support of certain factions or through their own military interventions. Shlaim also contends that these outside powers have frequently prioritized their own interests over the well-being and self-determination of the people of the Middle East.
Another key theme of the book is the impact of colonialism and imperialism on the Middle East. Shlaim traces the history of the region from the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after World War I to the present day, highlighting how the various European powers that came to dominate the region often treated it as a playground for their own geopolitical ambitions. He also examines the lasting legacy of colonialism, including the artificial borders and client states that were imposed on the Middle East by the European powers.
Shlaim also explores the role of Arab nationalism in shaping the modern Middle East, and the various movements and leaders that have sought to unite the Arab world against external threats and injustices. He discusses the rise and fall of various Arab regimes, including the Ba'athist regimes in Iraq and Syria, and the ways in which they have sought to assert their power and influence both within the region and on the global stage.
Throughout the book, Shlaim provides a nuanced and balanced analysis of the various actors and events that have shaped the Middle East, avoiding the simplistic narratives often presented in mainstream media. He also offers a sobering assessment of the prospects for peace in the region, arguing that lasting peace will require a recognition of the rights and interests of all parties involved, rather than a one-sided focus on the interests of a single nation or group.
In conclusion, Avi Shlaim's "War and Peace in the Middle East" is a valuable and thought-provoking examination of the complex and often tumultuous history of the region. It offers a nuanced and critical perspective on the various forces that have shaped the Middle East, and offers a sobering assessment of the prospects for peace in the region.
War and Peace in the Middle East: A Critique of American Policy by Avi Shlaim
The Gulf became heavily militarized without any perceptible gain in either regional security or internal stability. I also learnt to my surprise that George Bush Sr. Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance. Realpolitik in the Gulf In the Persian Gulf, America had two interests: the independence and security of the oil-producing states ensuring access to oil and to contain the Soviets. It implied the creation of an Islamic bloc…. The aftershocks are with us today. The Balfour Declaration pledged British support for a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine.
War and peace in the Middle East : a critique of American policy
Anthony's College and a former professor of international relations at the University of Oxford. The building of the wall is one example of the methods by which the Sharon government is putting constant and relentless pressure on the Palestinians to drive them from their land and livelihood, separating farmers from their land and workers from their jobs. A vi Shlaim is a fellow of St. Because of it's brevity, it obviously doesn't include all relevant background information and therefore gives a more biased picture than a longer book might. Weiss sounds a clarion call to Jewish readers who share her growing angst as well as non-Jewish Americans who wish to arm themselves with the knowledge and intellectual tools to combat marginalization and defuse and disavow trends of dehumanizing behavior.
The first 100 pages were very helpful, though, especially supplemented with wikipedia. Most of the book is spent discussing the Arab-Israel dispute and the Iraq-Iran front. The Labor Party was always committed to the survival of the Hashemite monarchy in Amman. They are widely identified as banes of human and international security and harbingers of anarchy. Interestingly he notes Huntingdon's "Clash of Civilisation" article, which was published shortly before the book was written, and notes the danger inherent in blaming religion and philosophy for the region's conflicts while overlooking the obvious political and economic issues. This was a good book when it was published in 1995, but twenty years later it's too dated to be very useful.
(PDF) War and Peace in the Middle East: A Concise History Revised and Updated
There are places I wished he would spend more time and go into more detail. Transjordan Jordan annexed the West Bank, and the Palestinians lost their homeland. He should be left to get on with his life. If a collective will is necessary to solve the problems of the future, what does the past foretell: a grim or hopeful picture? I think it is inaccurate to claim that American Jews were the principal force behind the war in Iraq. It also meant the end of a security system that had operated in Arabia since the first half of the 19 th century.
War and peace in the Middle East : Avi Shlaim : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Avi Shlaim was born in Baghdad in 1945, grew up in Israel, and studied at Cambridge University and the London School of Economics. Israeli Justice Minister Tommy Lapid denounced Vanunu as a traitor to his country, his synagogue a convert to Christianity, he is currently under the protection of the Palestinian archbishop of Jerusalem and his nation. What annoyed me was Schlaims tendency to judge several rulers and regimes as 'evil', without much elaboration. Vice President Cheney and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld are not. I was hoping for more, but not surprised that the book didn't deliver. You have been very harsh on Ariel Sharon, but is there really evidence to say that he is an anomaly in Israeli and Zionist history? The British assumed that Palestinians and Jews could leave peaceably in a single state, but Britain's obligation to the Jews could only be met at the expense of the Arab majority.
While Shlaim seems overly optimistic about the Oslo Accords, he does end the book with some helpful and prescient analysis that, if followed by the US, would have gone far toward avoiding more recent conflicts. The fact that some Israelis, like Golda Meir, have denied the existence of a Palestinian nation is neither here nor there. The Palestinians are clearly a nation, because that is how they define themselves. The Israelis use this fact against them. Following densely political discourses on Zionism and radical Islam, the author offers a list of bullet-point solutions focused on using behavioral and personal action items—individual accountability, active involvement, building community, loving neighbors, etc. In short, it was a good read; the first history book or kind of academic book that I read outside my classes's requirement. Shlaim closes with wise advice toward defusing militant Islamism.
War and peace in the Middle East : a concise history : Shlaim, Avi : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
In particular he describes how the various powers inside and outside the region have failed to produce peace. Sharon seems to have been defeated on his plan to withdraw from Gaza. Daniel Pipes is also the founder of Campus Watch accused by some of modern-day McCarthyism , which monitors and exposes Middle East academics for alleged anti-Israel activity. Do you consider yourself to be Iraqi to any degree?. He was elected a fellow of the British Academy in 2006. First of all, how would you advise President Bush to extract himself from the current calamity in Iraq? Recently the Canadian anticonsumerism magazine Adbusters created an uproar when it pointed out that most of the intellectual architects of the Iraq war were Jewish, with a history of pro-Israel activity.
Shlaim Collusion Across Jordan, 1988 , a leading historian of the Israeli revisionist school, offers a brief but suggestive overview of the US role in the Middle East. After years of dialogue supporting the concept of Arab unity, however, what do Arab states have to show for it? This thin little book is a concise and understandable overview of the conflicts in the middle east from the decline of the Ottoman phase at the end of World War I to 1995, when this book was written. The Arab Gulf states made an effective contribution to the 1973 Yom Kippur War by restricting oil exports to America and supporters of Israel. It is deplorable that the Israeli authorities are still hounding and harassing him and persecuting any journalist who tries to interview him. Terms of Sale: We guarantee the condition of every book as it's described on the Abebooks web sites.
As a result, a steady trickle of Palestinians are moving from the West Bank to the East Bank, to Jordan and to other Arab and Gulf nations. Shlaim concludes by noting the failure of American policy makers to address the real problems of the region: the lack of democracy and human rights in Arab states and the gap between rich and poor throughout the area. Now, 16 years after the book was written, these simply seem irrelevant and outdated. There is little mention of the Saudis in the book, though. WAR AND PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST A Concise History Avi Shlaim Penguin Books, 1995, 151 pp. Would you like to comment? America is embroiled in a quagmire in Iraq, and it is in no position to invade or attack Syria, even if it wanted to. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency.
