Balfour report 1926. The Balfour Report 2022-12-23
Balfour report 1926 Rating:
8,4/10
931
reviews
The Balfour Report, also known as the Balfour Declaration, was a document produced in 1926 by a committee of the British Parliament, led by Lord Balfour, which addressed the issue of Palestine and the rights of Jews and Arabs in the region. The report was a response to the Arab riots of 1920 and 1921, which had been sparked by growing tensions between the Arab and Jewish communities in Palestine.
The Balfour Report recognized the historical connections of the Jewish people to Palestine and acknowledged the need for a "national home" for the Jewish people in the region. However, it also emphasized the need to protect the rights of the Arab population and to ensure that any measures taken to establish a Jewish homeland did not prejudice the civil and religious rights of the Arab inhabitants of Palestine.
One of the key recommendations of the Balfour Report was the establishment of a legislative council in Palestine, which would include both Arab and Jewish representation. The report also called for the development of a system of government that would be "based on justice and fair play" and would ensure that the rights of all communities in Palestine were protected.
The Balfour Report was significant in that it marked the first time that the British government had officially recognized the right of the Jewish people to a national home in Palestine. However, it also sparked controversy and was met with criticism from both Arabs and Jews. Many Arab leaders saw the report as a betrayal of their rights and interests, while some Jewish leaders felt that the report did not go far enough in securing a Jewish homeland.
Despite these criticisms, the Balfour Report played a significant role in shaping the future of Palestine and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It set the stage for the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 and has had a lasting impact on the political and social landscape of the region.
Document Balfour Report 1926
It is for each Government to decide to what extent its concurrence in the ratification will be facilitated by its participation in the conclusion of the treaty, as, for instance, by the appointment of a common plenipotentiary. We also studied, in the light of the Resolution of the Imperial Conference of 1923 to which reference has already been made, the question of the representation of the different parts of the Empire at International Conferences. No difficulty arises as regards representation at conferences convened by, or under the auspices of, the League of Nations. Connected with the question last mentioned, was that of adherence of the United States of America to the Protocol establishing the Permanent Court of International Justice. Procedure in Relation to Treaties 6 b.
One question which we studied was that of arbitration in international disputes, with special reference to the question of acceptance of Article 36 of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, providing for the compulsory submission of certain classes of cases to the Court. The title of His Majesty the King is of special importance and concern to all parts of His Majesty's Dominions. In the case of such conferences all members of the League are invited, and if they attend are represented separately by separate delegations. We felt that the full representation of India on an equal footing with Great Britain and the Dominions would not only be welcomed, but could very properly be given, due regard being had to the special constitutional position of India as explained in Section III of this Report. This marked the See also:. The story of the Balfour Report has frequently been told. The British Empire is not founded upon negations.
The signature of a treaty on behalf of a part of the Empire should cover territories for which a mandate has been given to that part of the Empire, unless the contrary is stated at the time of the signature. In the latter sphere, a beginning had been made towards making clear those relations by the Resolution of the Imperial Conference of 1923 on the subject of the negotiations, signature and ratification of treaties. The difference between the legislative competence of the Par liam ent at Westminster and of the Dominion Par liam ents in that Acts passed by the latter operate, as a general rule, only within the territorial area of the Dominion concerned. Who was the author of the Balfour Declaration? The tendency towards equality of status was both right and inevitable. In order to avoid any difficulty in future, it is recommended that when it is thought necessary that a treaty should contain a clause of this character, it should take the form of a provision that the treaty should come into force when it has been ratified on behalf of so many separate Members of the League.
See Mackenzie King and South African Prime Minister J. Its widely scattered parts have very different characteristics, very different histories, and are at very different stages of evolution; while, considered as a whole, it defies classification and bears no real resemblance to any other political organization which now exists or has ever yet been tried. It was, however, generally recognised that where changes in the existing system were proposed which, while primarily affecting one part, raised issues in which other parts were also concerned, such changes ought only to be carried out after consultation and discussion. Its widely scattered parts have very different characteristics, very different histories, and are at very different stages of evolution; while, considered as a whole, it defies classification and bears no real resemblance to any other political organisation which now exists or has ever yet been tried. We took note that the representatives of India particularly desired that India , in view of the importance of her shipping interests, should be given an opportunity of being represented at the proposed Sub-Conference. Free institutions are its life-blood.
What caused the Statute of Westminster? Instructions to this effect had indeed already been given. Every self-governing member of the Empire is now the master of its destiny. Download your updated document, export it to the cloud, print it from the editor, or share it with other participants using a Shareable link or as an email attachment. The findings of the report were made law by the British Parliament in the 1931 Statute of Westminster. Merchant Shipping Legislation Somewhat similar considerations to those set out above governed our attitude towards a similar, though a special, question raised in relation to Merchant Shipping Legislation. The Canadian Encyclopedia, 16 December 2013, Historica Canada.
Compulsory Arbitration in International Disputes. Gilbert, The Roots of Appeasement London, 1966. In cases other than those where Dominion Ministers were accredited to the Heads of Foreign States, it was agreed to be very desirable that the existing diplomatic channels should continue to be used, as between the Dominion Governments and foreign Governments, in matters of general and political concern. In the case of a Government that prefers not to concur in the ratification of a treaty unless it has been signed by a plenipotentiary authorised to act on its behalf, it will advise the appointment of a plenipotentiary so to act. Such a criticism, however, completely ignores the historic situation. In fact, if not always in form, it is subject to no compulsion whatever. Merchant Shipping Legislation 5 e.
It depends essentially, if not formally, on positive ideals. The reservation of Dominion legislation, in certain circumstances, for the signification of His Majesty's pleasure which is signified on advice tendered by His Majesty's Government in Great Britain. What were the main points of Balfour Declaration? The plenipotentiaries for the various British units should have full powers, issued in each case by the King on the advice of the Government concerned, indicating and corresponding to the part of the Empire for which they are to sign. See Section V a. Our reason for limiting their scope to Great Britain and the Dominions is that the position of India in the Empire is already defined by the Government of India Act, 1919.
Why was the Balfour Declaration 1926 important to the emergence of Australia as a sovereign nation?
So long as the initiating Government receives no adverse comments and so long as its policy involves no active obligations on the part of the other Governments, it may proceed on the assumption that its policy is generally acceptable. Nevertheless, practically all the Dominions are engaged to some extent, and some to a considerable extent, in the conduct of foreign relations, particularly those with foreign countries on their borders. Conferences of a political character called by a foreign Government must be considered on the special circumstances of each individual case. The particular points involved were: ¾ The present practice under which Acts of the Dominion Par liam ents are sent each year to London, and it is intimated, through the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs, that His Majesty will not be advised to exercise his powers of disallowance with regard to them. Working on documents with our extensive and user-friendly PDF editor is easy.
