Helen Keller was a remarkable woman who overcame numerous challenges in her life, including deafness and blindness. However, she was not mute.
Born in 1880, Helen Keller lost her hearing and vision at the age of 19 months due to an illness. Despite this, she learned to communicate and advocate for herself and others with disabilities. She attended the Perkins School for the Blind and learned to read and write in braille. She also learned to speak, although her speech was difficult for others to understand due to her deafness.
Throughout her life, Helen Keller worked as an author, lecturer, and activist. She wrote several books, including "The Story of My Life," which described her experiences growing up as a deaf and blind person. She also traveled internationally as a lecturer, sharing her experiences and advocating for the rights of people with disabilities.
Helen Keller's determination and perseverance in the face of immense challenges inspired many people around the world. She is remembered as a symbol of hope and possibility, proving that even those who face seemingly insurmountable obstacles can achieve great things.
In conclusion, while Helen Keller faced many challenges due to her deafness and blindness, she was not mute. She learned to communicate through braille, speech, and writing, and used these skills to become an influential and inspiring figure.
Critiquing an article in APA style involves evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of a research study and presenting your analysis in a clear, concise, and structured manner. The following steps outline the process for critiquing an article in APA style:
Read the article thoroughly and take notes: Start by reading the article in its entirety, paying attention to the main points and arguments made by the author. As you read, take notes on the key elements of the article, including the research question, methodology, results, and conclusion.
Evaluate the research question: Consider the research question being addressed in the article. Is it clear and well-defined? Does it address an important and relevant topic? Is the research question appropriately focused and specific?
Assess the methodology: Consider the research methods used in the study. Are they appropriate and sufficient for answering the research question? Is the sample size adequate and representative? Is the data collection process described in sufficient detail?
Analyze the results: Examine the results of the study and consider how well they support the research question. Are the results clearly presented and easy to understand? Do the results align with the hypotheses or predictions made by the researchers?
Evaluate the conclusion: Consider the conclusion of the article and whether it is supported by the results of the study. Does the conclusion address the research question and adequately summarize the findings? Is the conclusion supported by the evidence presented in the article?
Identify the strengths and limitations of the study: Identify the strengths of the study, such as the use of a rigorous research design or the inclusion of a diverse sample. Also consider the limitations of the study, such as the potential for bias or the lack of generalizability to other populations.
Write your critique: Use the points you have identified to write a clear, concise critique of the article. Follow the guidelines for writing a manuscript in APA style, including using headings and subheadings to organize your critique. Be sure to provide specific examples and evidence to support your evaluation of the article.
In summary, critiquing an article in APA style involves evaluating the research question, methodology, results, and conclusion of a study and identifying its strengths and limitations. By following these steps, you can effectively critique an article and present your analysis in a clear, organized manner.
