Female infanticide is a deeply disturbing and troubling practice that involves the killing of newborn baby girls because of their gender. It is a form of gender-based violence and discrimination that has been perpetrated in many parts of the world for centuries, and it continues to be a significant problem in certain parts of the globe today.
One of the main reasons for female infanticide is the cultural preference for male children in some societies. In these cultures, boys are often seen as more valuable than girls because they can carry on the family name and provide financial support to their parents in their old age. As a result, girls are often seen as a burden, and parents may feel pressure to have only male children. This cultural preference for male children often leads to the discrimination and neglect of girls, including the practice of female infanticide.
Another reason for female infanticide is the societal pressure to have smaller families. In some parts of the world, there are strict population control policies in place that encourage couples to have fewer children. In these societies, having a girl may be seen as a disappointment, leading some parents to consider killing their newborn daughters in order to try for a son.
Female infanticide also occurs as a result of the widespread availability of sex-selective abortions. In some countries, it is possible to determine the gender of a fetus early in pregnancy through medical testing. This has led to the widespread use of abortion as a means of eliminating female fetuses in an effort to have a male child.
The consequences of female infanticide are devastating and far-reaching. It leads to a gender imbalance in the population, with far more men than women. This can lead to social problems such as a shortage of brides and an increase in human trafficking. Female infanticide also has serious consequences for the health and well-being of the women and girls who do manage to survive. Girls who grow up in societies where they are discriminated against and neglected are more likely to suffer from poor health and lack of access to education and opportunities.
It is important to address the issue of female infanticide and work to eliminate this practice. This can be done through education and awareness campaigns, as well as through laws and policies that protect the rights of girls and women. It is also important to address the underlying cultural and societal attitudes that contribute to the practice of female infanticide and work to promote gender equality and the value of all human life. Only by addressing the root causes of female infanticide can we hope to eliminate this deeply disturbing practice and create a more just and equal world for all.
12 Angry Men is a classic film that explores the inner workings of a jury as they deliberate a verdict in a murder trial. Throughout the film, various conflicts arise as the jurors attempt to reach a unanimous decision. These conflicts can be analyzed through the lens of interpersonal, intrapersonal, and group dynamics.
One major conflict in the film is the interpersonal conflict between Juror 8, played by Henry Fonda, and Juror 3, played by Lee J. Cobb. Juror 8 is the protagonist of the film and is the only juror who initially votes "not guilty." He is calm, logical, and open-minded, while Juror 3 is hot-headed, closed-minded, and emotionally invested in the case. Throughout the film, Juror 3 becomes increasingly frustrated with Juror 8's refusal to change his vote, leading to several heated arguments between the two men.
Another conflict in the film is the intrapersonal conflict within Juror 8. Throughout the deliberation, Juror 8 grapples with his own doubts and biases as he tries to remain objective and consider all the evidence. He must also confront his own preconceived notions about the defendant and the justice system. This internal conflict ultimately leads Juror 8 to become more open-minded and willing to listen to the perspectives of his fellow jurors.
Finally, there is a group dynamic conflict within the jury as a whole. Initially, most of the jurors are convinced of the defendant's guilt and are eager to reach a quick verdict. However, as Juror 8 raises doubts and presents alternative interpretations of the evidence, the group dynamic shifts and the jurors become more divided. This conflict is exacerbated by the presence of strong personalities and differing viewpoints within the group.
In conclusion, the film 12 Angry Men illustrates various conflicts that arise within a group as they try to reach a unanimous decision. These conflicts include interpersonal conflict between Juror 8 and Juror 3, intrapersonal conflict within Juror 8, and group dynamic conflict within the jury as a whole. Through these conflicts, the film demonstrates the challenges and complexities of decision-making and the importance of remaining open-minded and considering all perspectives.
