Lenin compared to stalin. Lenin compared to Stalin 2022-12-08
Lenin compared to stalin Rating:
Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin were both influential figures in the history of the Soviet Union, but they had very different ideologies and approaches to governance.
Lenin, who was the leader of the Bolshevik Party and the first head of government in the Soviet Union, was a Marxist revolutionary who believed in the ideals of socialism and the overthrow of capitalism. He was a strong advocate for the working class and believed in the concept of "democratic centralism," in which decisions were made democratically within the party and then implemented centrally.
Stalin, on the other hand, was a more authoritarian leader who came to power after Lenin's death in 1924. He was more concerned with consolidating his own power and building the Soviet Union into a major global superpower. Stalin implemented a series of economic policies known as "socialism in one country," which focused on rapid industrialization and collectivization of agriculture. He also implemented a brutal regime of repression, in which he suppressed any opposition to his rule and orchestrated the deaths of millions of people through forced labor camps and purges.
Despite their different ideologies and approaches to governance, both Lenin and Stalin were instrumental in shaping the course of the Soviet Union. Lenin played a key role in the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the establishment of the Soviet Union, while Stalin's policies of industrialization and collectivization helped to transform the Soviet Union into a major world power.
However, the legacies of Lenin and Stalin are also very different. Lenin is often remembered as a visionary leader who fought for the rights of the working class, while Stalin is remembered as a ruthless dictator who oversaw widespread repression and human rights abuses. In the end, it is up to history to decide how these two leaders will be remembered, but it is clear that they both played a significant role in shaping the course of the Soviet Union and its place in the world.
Lenin vs Stalin: Their Showdown Over the Birth of the USSR
However this also affected the Russian people directly because: It angered many Russians, as lots of land, and the people living there were transferred to German control. His government was led by the Bolsheviks that were later on renamed as Communist Party. Retrieved October 11, 2022. Abstractively speaking, the Soviet Union, under Brezhnev, entered a new qualitative stage again, this is only an abstraction. I assume he and the other leaders had to take measures. In reality they didn't agree to the Bolshevik price fixing scheme, Lenin and Stalin reacted like totalitarian communists do: killing and imprisoning them and taking their produce.
Stalin in Russia first introduced the concept of collectivization and industrialization. He worked more like a writer, less as a politician. In view of our divine essence, we need only liberty and work; in view of our mortal nature, we need for our direction a guide and a support. Ideology: Lenin was a supporter of communism, whereas Stalin was more pragmatic and focused on ruling the Soviet Union through strength and fear. Lenin and Stalin had very different ideas of socialism, which ultimately led to the split between the two. His religion beliefs were soft. I will do this by looking into three main areas in soviet Russia including: Social and Economic policy, dealing with the opposition and Living and working conditions.
I consider his actions almost counter-revolutioanry but I do not blame him personally for it due to the grand scheme of things. You may have your opinions, but these should be properly supported. Lenin was credited for ending the rule of the tsar in …show more content… For instance, Lenin ruled for two years, whereas Stalin, who succeeded him, remained in power for 30 years. The core difference here is with other Marxists of the time, who did not envisage any political groupings as above others, they only understood the progression towards the classless society in egalitarian terms. More importantly, what really defines Stalinism is his economic policy, which aimed to depart from previous economic policy established by Lenin and which Stalin claimed was still far too close to capitalism. Although Living and working conditions were better under Lenin, Stalin achieved more.
Lenin suffered a stroke in 1922, forcing him into semi-retirement in Gorki. He was an extremely popular mass leader, but so was FDR. While there is good reason to assume that contemporary Marxist theorists were not in agreement with Lenin, there is an equally good reason to assume that Lenin was not truly in agreement with himself. There is nothing apologetic about what Dogukan is saying. Not for nothing is Lenin credited with ending the rule of the tsar in Russia as Imperial Russia was drowned in a bloody Bolshevik revolution of 1917.
Although they had many similarities, there are also important differences between them. Like me, he sees everything from a relative historical perspective. Lenin still considered Stalin to be a loyal ally, and when he got mired in squabbles with Trotsky and other politicians, he decided to give Stalin more power. One thinks that they are dead, because they did not move. He led the country through some of its most difficult times, including World War II and the Cold War. But there is more. I am pretty sure we can all agree that by our standards, Stalin committed horrible deeds.
After the October Revolution, Stalin was still useful to Lenin: Lenin knew that his brutal side would be useful during the civil war that erupted. Stalin was arrested in 1902 and was deported to Siberia but escaped and was back in Georgia two year later. After the death of Vladimir Lenin, Stalin gained control of power. I don't know whether this would be due to a sincere belief in the goals pursued by Stalin or as a power play to oppose Khrushchevites. According to a warsimulation by the Pentagon in 1953 the entire area of Russia would've been reduced to ruins with 60 million casualties.
Lenin Vs Stalin: What's The Difference? » Differencess
Their forms have been varied according to the problems they have been called to cure, and according to character of the people they have ruled over. The treaty was a severe blow to Russia, which meant losing: 34% of its population, 32% of its agricultural land, 54% of its industry, 26% of its railways and 89% of its coalmines. This conflicted with general strategy set by Lenin and Trotsky, which focused upon the capture of Warsaw further north. . Vladimir Lenin and the Bolsheviks, communists, fought and won the Russian Civil War.
How important was Lenin compared to Stalin in creating the Soviet Union?
Of course, I haven't studied Lenin very much, so take that with a grain of salt. For this reason some refer to Stalinism as any doctrine that is overly authoritarian or has the potential of costing lives. Russia just had a revolution and a civil war. Retrieved June 26, 2020. You cannot simply separate these individuals from the historical, economic, social conditions, etc.
He was the first to adopt the ideals of Karl Marx, and combined them with his own to form what is known as Marxism-Leninism. Twenty million died under Stalin in thirty years. I emphasise concrete because for the future Marxists that will be dealt with here, this concreteness disappears into a paradoxically ephemeral yet constant enemy. Stalin was sent to the city of Tsaritsyn later known as Stalingrad, now Volgograd. At the same time, there are many forms of Marxism — so to enumerate all the differences is like taking up on enumerating the differences between differences of Christianity of which there are certainly more variants, my point is that it is an equally impossible task. In 1937 it spread to the arm forces and then quickly came to effect the ordinary people.
Although Stalin did not meet his targets he was steadily increasing production of electricity, coal, oil, pig iron and steel. Their early lives are similar. Historical conditions and economic conditions come down, ultimately, to individuals. However, despite all the similarities and overlap in beliefs and character, there were differences between the two communist leaders that will be highlighted in this article. That said, there were two major things Stalin did which Lenin didn't want: one, he killed fellow Communists in the Purges, as you mentioned , and he gave up on spreading international revolution, instead focusing on "socialism in one country". This is the theoretical side of the communist idea; the practical side requires a careful planning of the country's economy and also a system that makes sure that everybody is treated equally.