Social Darwinism was a theory that was popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which argued that certain groups of people were biologically superior to others and therefore had the right to dominate and control them. This theory was often used to justify colonialism and imperialism, as well as racial and ethnic discrimination.
In the context of Aboriginal Australia, social Darwinism played a significant role in shaping the way that Aboriginal people were treated by European colonists and the broader society. The theory was used to justify the colonization of Australia and the displacement of Indigenous peoples from their land, as well as the policies and practices of assimilation and segregation that were implemented towards Indigenous Australians in the 20th century.
The notion of social Darwinism was based on the idea that certain races were more fit and evolved than others, and that it was therefore natural and justified for the superior races to dominate the inferior ones. This idea was often used to justify the treatment of Indigenous Australians as inferior and less evolved, and to argue that they were not capable of managing their own affairs or participating in mainstream society.
However, social Darwinism has been widely debunked and rejected as a scientifically flawed and morally reprehensible theory. It has been recognized that all human beings are equally evolved and have the same inherent value and dignity, regardless of their race or ethnicity.
Despite this, the legacy of social Darwinism has had a lasting impact on the way that Indigenous Australians have been treated and perceived by mainstream society. It has contributed to the ongoing injustices and disparities that Indigenous Australians continue to face, including higher rates of poverty, illness, and incarceration, as well as ongoing issues with land rights and cultural recognition.
It is important to recognize and acknowledge the harmful impact of social Darwinism on Indigenous Australians, and to work towards a more just and equitable society that recognizes and respects the rights and dignity of all people. This includes acknowledging and addressing the ongoing impact of colonialism and the ongoing struggles for self-determination and justice faced by Indigenous Australians.
Australian History and Social Darwinism Essay Example
. They embraced the implications of social Darwinist theory, the main one being that inferior races were destined to poverty because of their lower evolutionary status. The racist authorities thought the job could be solved if autochthonal Australians were deceasing out. . With his idea of… Christopher Columbus Dbq Analysis For the Natives it was unreasonable for excess clothing to be worn given the climate, but because the Spanish believed only their version of society was right, the Spaniards forced the Natives to change to adapt to their way of life. He strongly believed that no assistance should be provided to those in need. Eleanor, 2002 Even cruel is that indigenous Australians were treated like experimental animals, which were allowed by settle policy.
SOCIAL DARWINISM AND THE LANGUAGE OF RACIAL OPPRESSION: Australia's Stolen Generations on JSTOR
Competition A simplified position of Social Darwinism is that people, particularly for work forces, have to vie to last in the hereafter. New South Wales appointed a Protector of Aborigines in 1881, and in 1883 a Board for the Protection of Aborigines was established, with the Aborigines Protection Act being introduced in 1909 New South Wales Government, 1909. However, Social Darwinism is a belief and it is popular in the late Victorian ear in England, America and elsewhere. . The most significant of these Acts was the Immigration Restriction Act of 1901 Critical Classroom, Australian Federation. Based on Eugenics Theory, about 100,000 children with indigenous blood were taken away from their families.
Impact Of Social Darwinism On Aboriginal Education
Even cruel is that autochthonal Australians were treated like experimental animate beings, which were allowed by settle policy. Darwinism, they claim, also had a number of social and cultural consequences: economic and political, medical, eugenic, educational, and religious. Lastly, the success of the…. The basic race construct of Social Darwinism is that white race should educate other races of people in the universe by a civilised manner. This theory is developed by Darwin 's cousin, Francis Galton. They can not give any assistance to the poor because they must feed themselves. The White Australia policy was a group of historical policies that were initiated in response to regulate non-white immigrants but was also used to wield power over Indigenous Australians.
Social Darwinism In Australia
Read, 2001 Decision Conclusively, Social Darwinism is a popular societal development theory in 19 century. This notion and idea of race as Langton argues is an out-dated ideology, a western idea that helped support colonialism which has been deeply ingrained into Australian society. Social Darwinism is a social theory that Natural Selection in Darwin's Theory is used to human society. This provides a more accurate assessment that integrates the relevant cultural issues, recognition of the availability of therapeutic support, and social and emotional counseling. Some Social Darwinists use this concept to illustrate the social progress and inevitable change. How Does Collectivism Affect Aboriginal People 609 Words 3 Pages Source 1 depicts the lack of collectivism between the Aboriginal people and the generation we live today. Initially, he tried to transform a group of men by clearing their cultural identities such as their names, clothing, and hair styles.
