Spartan plastics inc. Spartan Plastics, 269 N.L.R.B. 546 2023-01-07
Spartan plastics inc
Rating:
7,2/10
1997
reviews
Spartan Plastics Inc. is a leading manufacturer of plastic products in the United States. The company was founded in the early 1990s by a group of experienced professionals in the plastics industry who saw a need for high-quality, cost-effective plastic products. Since its inception, Spartan Plastics has grown significantly and now has multiple production facilities across the country.
One of the key factors that has contributed to the success of Spartan Plastics is its commitment to innovation and continuous improvement. The company invests heavily in research and development, which has resulted in the development of new and improved products and manufacturing processes. This focus on innovation has allowed Spartan Plastics to stay ahead of the competition and meet the changing needs of its customers.
In addition to its commitment to innovation, Spartan Plastics is also known for its focus on sustainability. The company recognizes the importance of minimizing its environmental impact and has implemented a number of initiatives to reduce its carbon footprint. These efforts include the use of energy-efficient equipment and the recycling of materials.
Another factor that sets Spartan Plastics apart from its competitors is its dedication to customer satisfaction. The company has a team of experienced professionals who work closely with customers to understand their needs and develop solutions that meet their requirements. This dedication to customer service has helped Spartan Plastics build strong relationships with its clients and has contributed to its success.
Overall, Spartan Plastics has established itself as a leader in the plastics industry. With its commitment to innovation, sustainability, and customer satisfaction, the company is well positioned to continue its growth and success in the future.
Spartan Plastics (Cand) Ltd.
Respondent Controller Anderson gave an affidavit to a Board field employee reporting that employees were asked who had "authored" the questions, and employee McCaleb recalled that "author" was used. SPARTAN OFFERS TWO COMPOSITE MATS TO COVER A WIDE RANGE OF INDUSTRIES AND NEEDS Spartan products are the right answer for anyone who needs temporary access, ground protection, or a stable work area. It pays you back in lower transportation costs and yet covers the same or more square footage. Response: Diamond Reo was a fine company in its time and they lasted for 70 years. WE WILL NOT discharge, suspend, or otherwise discriminate against employees in regard to hire or tenure of employment because they protest against changes in working conditions. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution. Each and every part is cross-referenced, and quality assured to ensure our customers only receive premium products.
Next
Spartan Plastics, Inc. in Sherman Oaks CA
These may be in rural areas, along a busy highway or river, or in the middle of town. The Board held that nonsolicitation rules refer- ring to either "non-working time" or "non-working hours" are overly broad and presumptively invalid in that they are ambiguous regarding an employee's right to engage in protected concerted activity "during periods of the workday when they are properly not engaged in their work tasks e. Further, the fact that the same person performed the roles of investigator and trial attorney is inconsequential in this proceeding. The world we live in, more sustainable. Cease and desist from a Discharging, suspending, or otherwise dis- criminating against employees in regard to hire or tenure of employment, or any term or condition of employment because they protest against changes in working conditions.
Next
ABOUT US
The fact of the matter is that the majority of factory personnel at S. Louis, Missouri,and the major customers of the organization are comprised of three automobile companies, General motor, Ford and Chrysler. Let Spartan handle the logistics so your team can move on to the next project. No one has a crystal ball to predict the future. The company was found in 1976, and the business model of the company comprises of selling premium quality plastic components at fair prices. Wanting to rent or purchase? Kasel told him that any ar- rangements would have to be made through his attorney. These questions, not being egregious, did not lose such protection, but Respondent, in interrogating Kasel and the other em- ployees' did nothing to discriminate between legitimate inquiries on the one hand, and improper inquiries on the other.
Next
Spartan Plastics West Inc NSN Parts Online Catalog List
It is in a shambles; highest unemployment in 50 years; McClough Steel in bankruptcy; many other companies are on the fringe of bankruptcy. In Johnnie's Poultry8 the Board held that an employer may interrogate employees on matters concerning their Section 7 rights for the purpose of either verifying a union's claim of majority status or. Sure wish they would not keep it a secret. Kasel wrote and had typed some questions and kept about 20 photo- copies in his car. When did it happen? Okay, we have heard of them. Kasel testified that he learned of the meeting only on the morning of August 13, and immediately after work that afternoon went to his car, got the photocopied questions, and in conference with other employees added additional handwritten ques- tions.
Next
Spartan Plastics Case Solution And Analysis, HBR Case Study Solution & Analysis of Harvard Case Studies
Response: Management has never claimed our wages and benefits to be second to none. W Bearings was recently overruled by our decision in Our Way, Inc. In 2018, to support a consistently growing demand, we added another 40 million pounds of compounding assets. We factory workers work so we can have decent benefits and the personnel who administer those benefits recall them e. Innovation Brought To Life Every day, in every part of the world, people benefit from the products we provide. Further, it argues that the judge improperly permitted the General Counsel to use a witness' affida- vit to refresh his recollection.
Next
Spartech—Welcome to Spartech
But for us, there is a greater plan. Please place the order on the website to get your own originally done case solution. On August 12, Respondent and the committee agreed that there should be a mass meeting the following day, after working hours, at 3:30 p. The judge Once the activity is found to be concerted, an 8 aXI violation will be found if, in addition, the employer knew of the concerted nature of the employee's activity, the concerted activity was protected by the Act, and the adverse employment action at issue e. Kasel's discharge was therefore based solely on his protected concerted activity protesting changes in working conditions, and was in violation of the Act.
Next
Spartan Composites
The interrogation of Kasel and of the other employees was therefore an improper inter- ference with, or restraint or coercion, of employees en- gaging in concerted activity, and constituted a violation of Section 8 a 1 of the Act. By discharging Tim E. The Board's established policy is not to overrule an administrative law judge's credibility resolutions unless the clear preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces us that they are incorrect. Every year it seems S. Gainesville Regional Utilities Feed-in Tariff Epilogue Ideas Are Born in Fields of Play Accentures War for Talent in India Monroe Clock Company B Regional Advertising Industry of New England Note on Crude Oil and Crude Oil Derivatives Markets Leadership Assignment Movile B : Building New Venture Opportunities IS THAILAND ATTRACTIVE FOR HONG KONG ORGANIZATIONS? That would be a foolish statement.
Next
Spartan Plastics, 269 N.L.R.B. 546
Later that day Clemens phoned again, to ask Kasel whether another time could be arranged for him to come to the plant. During the Project New to mats or need extra help? However, the judge applied the wrong standard in reaching his conclusion. . Ajax Paving Industries, 261 NLRB 695 1982 , enfd. Alprin issued the attached decision. As for the defense that the discharge was for promulgat- ing malicious statements, I have above found that the questions were not so malicious as to have lost the pro- tection of the Act.
Next