The study of poetry arnold summary. Matthew Arnold summary 2023-01-06
The study of poetry arnold summary Rating:
8,4/10
1032
reviews
In F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel The Great Gatsby, the title character Jay Gatsby is a complex and enigmatic figure. He is a wealthy young man who throws lavish parties at his mansion in West Egg, Long Island, but very little is known about his past or how he made his fortune.
One of Gatsby's most notable characteristics is his extreme wealth. He lives in a massive mansion and has a fleet of luxury cars, and he is always impeccably dressed and well-groomed. Gatsby's wealth allows him to live a lavish lifestyle, but it also seems to be a source of insecurity for him. He is constantly trying to impress others with his wealth, and he seems to be in constant pursuit of more.
Another characteristic of Gatsby is his mystery. Very little is known about his past, and he is notoriously evasive about his personal history. He tells different people different stories about his background, and it is not until later in the novel that his true identity is revealed. This mystery only adds to Gatsby's allure, as people are drawn to him because they want to know more about him.
Despite his wealth and mystery, Gatsby is also a deeply sensitive and emotional character. He is deeply in love with the novel's narrator, Nick Carraway's, cousin Daisy Buchanan, and he spends the entire novel trying to win her back after she marries Tom Buchanan. Gatsby's love for Daisy is so intense that it borders on obsession, and he is willing to do whatever it takes to win her over.
Gatsby is also a very generous and hospitable character. He throws lavish parties at his mansion and invites anyone and everyone, even people he barely knows. He wants to be liked and admired by others, and he goes to great lengths to make sure that his guests are well taken care of.
Overall, Jay Gatsby is a complex and multifaceted character in The Great Gatsby. He is driven by his wealth and his love for Daisy, and he is constantly trying to impress and win over those around him. Despite his flaws, he is a deeply sensitive and emotional character, and his mystery only adds to his allure.
The Study Of Poetry By Matthew Arnold • English Summary
Through the poem, Arnold explores his desire to escape society. Though these questions are rhetorical questions, the poet aims to ma. It appeared later in Essays in Criticism, Second Series. He borrows this approach from Longinus who said in his sublime vision that if a certain sublimity model could please anyone regardless of habits, taste or age and could always be pleasing then it could be considered a real sublime example. Christian of Troyes was a French romance writer. However, their poetry was dominated by romance over serious and graver themes of human life. But they lead to a dangerous abuse of language.
His poetry transcends and effaces, easily and without effort, all the romance-poetry of Catholic Christendom; it transcends and effaces all the English poetry contemporary with it, it transcends and effaces all the English poetry subsequent to it down to the age of Elizabeth. In here we will discuss three different theorists Aristotle, Longinus, and Wordsworth from three different theories mimetic, pragmatic and expressive and explain their rules and thoughts to what is "good" literature. An historic estimate of that poetry has established itself; and the question is, whether it will be found to coincide with the real estimate. Was it that with men born to misery ye might have sorrow? In this essay Arnold criticizes the art of poetry as well as the art of criticism. Let us add, therefore, to what we have said, this: that the substances and matter of the best poetry acquire their special character from possessing, in an eminent degree, truth and seriousness. After Arnold talks about French Poetry and its impact on English Poetry.
The study of poetry by Matthew Arnold summery and analysis..
Here also we overrate the object of our interest, and apply to it a language of praise which is quite exaggerated. By his English poetry Burns in general belongs to the eighteenth century, and has little importance for us. A nation may have versifiers with smooth numbers and easy rhymes, and yet may have no real poetry at all. Was it that with men born to misery ye might have sorrow? As a result, a high degree of substance and matter can only be transmitted in a suitably high degree of style and manner. The needful qualities for a fit prose are regularity, uniformity, precision, balance. Continuity of the Classics Arnold claims since the classics works have been able to stand the test of time and longevity they have an indwelling ability of self-conservation.
The Study of Poetry by Matthew Arnold Summary and Notes
True, we must read our classic with open eyes, and not with eyes blinded with superstition; we must perceive when his work comes short, when it drops out of the class of the very best, and we must rate it, in such cases, at its proper value. Prologue to The Canterbury Tales. Yes; constantly in reading poetry, a sense for the best, the really excellent, and of the strength and joy to be drawn from it, should be present in our minds and should govern our estimate of what we read. As long as they stimulate such emotions and thoughts in the readers that will remain alive in their hearts and minds. Arnold believes that the best poems have a kernel of truth in their matter and a sense of singular flair in their construction or manner. He says that we should understand the worth of poetry as it is poetry that shows us a mirror of life.
He refers to these two diversionary strategies as the historical and personal fallacies, respectively. It can be recognized by placing it beside the known classics of the world. Burns, according to Arnold, is a better poet in Scottish than English. Religion has been unable to address basic issues confronting man since its standing has been threatened by science, which wrongly claims to be the new arbiter of knowledge. And I could wish every student of poetry to make the application of them for himself. One thinks of Homer; this is the sort of praise which is given to Homer, and justly given. Arnold was born into an influential English family—his father was a famed headmaster at Rugby—and graduated from Balliol College, Oxford.
[Answered] Summary of the study of poetry by matthew arnold
Critics spend a lot of time scrutinising works in order to determine their quality of work. With the next age of our poetry divergency and difficulty begin. He therefore urges critics to use the touch stone method to analyze and evaluate poetry. In contrast to this, poetry derives its meaning on flawless ideas. For Arnold there is no place for charlatanism in poetry.
Only once the reader has accomplished this will he be able to recognise and appreciate good poetry. Any amount of good books cannot surpass the height of old books as they are already outdated and people will continue to enjoy them for years to come. Arnold believes that the art of poetry is capable of high destinies. The accent of high seriousness, born of absolute sincerity, is what gives to such verse as In la sua volontade e nostra pace. Next Arnold talks about Milton and Shakespeare and gives them the classics and goes on to talk about Dryden and the Pope. Other poets with a like liberty do not attain to the fluidity of Chaucer; Burns himself does not attain to it. His premise is that rational individuals, in the absence of ultimate criteria, may agree on the level of a poet's creativity as well as his 'critique of life.
Arnold now talks about Robert Burnsin the late eighteenth century and says that this is the time when personal equality begins to affect real equality. Vitet gives to the Chanson de Roland. This is done purposefully to perpetuate the notion that art is beneficial. Poetry makes men moral, better and nobler, but it does so not through direct teaching, or by appealing to reason, but by appealing to the soul of man. But if he is a real classic, if his work belongs to the class of the very best. Real Burns who is an influential Scottish poet has been evaluated like Chaucer. He presents us a view of literature in a mainly negative way.
