W.H. Auden is considered a modern poet for a number of reasons. One of the most significant factors that contribute to his status as a modern poet is his innovative use of language and form. Auden was known for his experimentation with different styles and forms, including free verse, traditional rhyme schemes, and even prose poetry. This willingness to experiment and challenge the conventions of traditional poetry helped to define Auden as a modernist poet.
Another key aspect of Auden's modernity is his engagement with the political and social issues of his time. Auden was a prolific writer who often addressed contemporary events and issues in his poetry, including the rise of fascism in Europe, the threat of nuclear war, and the social and political upheaval of the 1960s. His poems often reflect a sense of disillusionment with the state of the world, as well as a desire to bring about change and create a better future.
In addition to his use of language and engagement with contemporary issues, Auden's modernity can also be seen in his use of traditional poetic forms in unconventional ways. For example, he often employed the sonnet form in his poetry, but he often used it in a way that broke with traditional conventions, such as using irregular rhyme schemes or mixing elements of free verse with traditional structure.
Overall, Auden's innovative use of language, engagement with contemporary issues, and experimentation with form all contribute to his status as a modern poet. His work continues to be widely read and studied today, and his influence on the development of modern poetry is undeniable.
The Thomas Green case is a well-known study in business ethics that highlights the challenges and consequences of ethical decision-making in the workplace. The case involves Thomas Green, a successful middle manager at Dynamic Systems, Inc. (DSI), a company that manufactures and sells computer systems. Green was known for his high level of integrity and his commitment to ethical business practices.
However, Green faced a difficult ethical dilemma when he learned that DSI was planning to engage in a unethical business practice. The company was considering using substandard components in its computer systems in order to cut costs and increase profits. Green knew that this would be a serious breach of ethics and could potentially harm DSI's customers.
Despite the potential consequences, Green decided to speak out against the practice and refused to go along with it. He argued that it was important to prioritize the safety and satisfaction of the company's customers over short-term profits. However, his superiors at DSI disagreed with his stance and pressured him to go along with the plan.
Green's ethical dilemma became even more complex when he learned that DSI was also considering outsourcing its manufacturing operations to a company in a developing country where labor standards were lower. Green knew that this would result in job losses for DSI's employees in the United States and potentially lead to exploitation of the foreign workers.
Ultimately, Green's ethical stance cost him his job at DSI. His superiors saw his refusal to go along with the unethical business practices as insubordination and terminated his employment. Green's decision to stand up for his principles had significant personal and professional consequences, but it also set a positive example for other employees and demonstrated the importance of ethical behavior in the workplace.
The Thomas Green case highlights the importance of ethical decision-making in the business world. It demonstrates that individuals who act with integrity and stand up for their principles, even in the face of opposition, can make a positive impact on their organizations and the broader community. At the same time, it also shows that taking a stand on ethical issues can come with significant personal and professional risks and challenges.
