Burger king corporation organizational chart Rating:
9,1/10
1612
reviews
The Burger King Corporation is a global fast food chain that operates in more than 15,000 locations in over 100 countries. As a large and successful organization, Burger King has a well-defined organizational structure that helps to ensure the smooth and efficient operation of the company.
At the top of the organizational chart is the Board of Directors, which is responsible for making strategic decisions and setting the overall direction of the company. Below the Board of Directors is the CEO, who is responsible for implementing the decisions of the Board and overseeing the day-to-day operations of the company.
Under the CEO are several layers of management, including the Senior Vice Presidents, Vice Presidents, and Directors. These managers are responsible for overseeing specific departments or areas of the business, such as finance, marketing, and operations.
Below the management level are the employees who work in the various departments and locations of the company. These employees are responsible for carrying out the tasks and duties required to run the business, including cooking and serving food, managing customer service, and maintaining the cleanliness and safety of the restaurant.
In addition to the traditional hierarchical structure, Burger King also has a number of cross-functional teams that bring together employees from different departments to work on specific projects or initiatives. These teams are typically led by a manager or director, and they are responsible for achieving specific goals or objectives that are critical to the success of the company.
Overall, the organizational chart of Burger King reflects the complexity and scale of the company's operations. By clearly defining roles and responsibilities, Burger King is able to ensure that all employees are working together effectively to achieve the company's goals and deliver high-quality food and service to customers around the world.
Burger King’s Organizational Structure Analysis
Smith's new franchise regulations were soon put to the test. When Florescue bought eight units in California anyway, Smith sued successfully. Burger King's organizational structure was drastically altered as a result of this restructure to accommodate new worldwide growth initiatives. The buyers of these territorial rights, many of them large businesses themselves, could do what they wanted to in their territory: buy land, build as many stores as they liked, sell part of the territory to other investors, or diversify. A more radical expansion for the Burger King menu came next.
After nearly a decade and a half of stagnation characterized by several short-term CEOs and a like number of failed advertising campaigns, Burger King seemed to have been revitalized in the mid-1990s with a back-to-basics, value-oriented approach. Archived from PDF on July 18, 2019. While Gibbons was successful in accelerating the company's international growth, overall his tenure as CEO which lasted until 1993 brought a mixture of successes and failures. Retrieved August 25, 2007. Retrieved January 19, 2011. The system worked well, allowing Burger King to expand rapidly. Retrieved August 26, 2014.
The New York Times. Where this loosely knit franchising system failed, however, was in providing a consistent company image. Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Retrieved September 26, 2007. By 1996, Burger King had outlets in 56 countries, a dramatic increase from the 30 of just seven years earlier. Retrieved January 5, 2011.
Retrieved April 11, 2022. At home the company focused on attracting new customers. As part of the franchising reorganization segment of Operation Phoenix, Donald N. Retrieved August 25, 2007. . By early 1995, Adamson's program was paying off as same-store sales increased 6.
Retrieved December 31, 2011. Burger King's rearrangement resulted in growth, demonstrating the appropriateness of its present framework. Retrieved December 10, 2020. Retrieved March 10, 2022. Retrieved October 28, 2009. Retrieved January 2, 2022.
McLamore and Edgerton began in 1954 with a simple concept: to attract the burgeoning numbers of postwar baby boom families with reasonably-priced, broiled burgers served quickly. Retrieved March 21, 2022. The new Specialty Sandwich line was one of the first attempts to target a specific demographic, in this case, adults 18—34, who would be willing to spend more on a higher quality product. Retrieved October 24, 2007. Changes included updated franchise agreements, :119 :66 and new standardized restaurant designs.
Retrieved October 1, 2007. Retrieved January 5, 2010. Burger King seemed well-positioned to reach these goals and to attain new heights of prosperity in the next century. During the 1970s, output included its "Hold the pickles, hold the lettuce. . Retrieved January 25, 2010. Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit.
Retrieved April 12, 2008. Retrieved October 31, 2010. Retrieved April 6, 2008. Burger King must adjust its corporate structure over time to address changes in its business environment. A Burger King restaurant in Kuwait.
Corporate diversification and organizational structure: A resource-based view. Retrieved August 21, 2007. Retrieved May 27, 2019. Kramer, Louise, "Burger King Gets Back to Basics in Latest Ad Blitz," Nation's Restaurant News, April 29, 1996, p. Retrieved November 23, 2010. The Wall Street Journal.
