Extraordinary Measures is a 2010 drama film that tells the story of John Crowley, a successful businessman who is forced to confront the challenges of finding a cure for his two children who are suffering from a rare genetic disorder called Pompe disease. The film raises several important questions about the nature of illness, the role of science and technology in finding cures, and the power of hope and determination in the face of seemingly insurmountable challenges.
One of the main questions that the film raises is the extent to which science and technology can help us to overcome serious health issues. The film shows us the lengths that John Crowley is willing to go to in order to find a cure for his children, including working with a controversial scientist named Dr. Robert Stonehill who is not well-respected by the scientific community. The film suggests that there is always hope for finding a cure, no matter how difficult the challenge may seem, and that we should not give up on the search for answers.
Another question that the film raises is the role of hope and determination in the face of serious illness. Despite the bleak prognosis for his children, John Crowley remains determined to find a way to save them, and he never gives up hope that a cure will be found. The film suggests that hope and determination are powerful forces that can help us to overcome even the most difficult challenges, and that we should never give up on our dreams and goals, no matter how difficult they may seem.
Overall, Extraordinary Measures is a powerful and inspiring film that raises important questions about the nature of illness, the role of science and technology in finding cures, and the power of hope and determination in the face of seemingly insurmountable challenges. It is a film that reminds us that we should never give up on our dreams and goals, no matter how difficult they may seem, and that we should always strive to find ways to overcome even the most difficult challenges that life throws our way.
Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the practice of executing individuals as punishment for certain crimes. While it has been practiced in many societies throughout history, the use of capital punishment has been controversial and has sparked debates about its effectiveness and morality. In this essay, we will explore the issue of capital punishment in relation to human rights.
One of the main arguments against capital punishment is that it violates the right to life. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations in 1948, states that "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person." This right is considered to be fundamental and is protected by international law. Capital punishment, by its very nature, involves taking the life of the convicted person, and therefore, many argue that it violates the right to life.
Another argument against capital punishment is that it can be applied unfairly, particularly to marginalized or disadvantaged groups. There is evidence to suggest that capital punishment is disproportionately applied to people of color, poor people, and those with mental disabilities. This raises concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the criminal justice system, and suggests that the death penalty may be used as a tool of oppression rather than as a means of justice.
Additionally, there are concerns about the possibility of wrongful convictions in capital cases. Despite advances in forensic science and other forms of evidence, mistakes can still be made, and innocent people can be sentenced to death. In the United States, for example, there have been several cases where individuals have been sentenced to death and later exonerated through DNA testing or other means. The irreversibility of the death penalty means that once an execution has been carried out, there is no way to correct a wrongful conviction.
On the other hand, proponents of capital punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime and helps to protect society. They argue that the threat of the death penalty can discourage individuals from committing serious crimes, and that it provides justice for the victims of such crimes. Some also argue that the death penalty is necessary to send a message that certain crimes will not be tolerated.
However, there is little evidence to support the claim that capital punishment serves as an effective deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that the rate of crime is not significantly lower in states that have the death penalty compared to those that do not. Additionally, other forms of punishment, such as life imprisonment, can also serve as a deterrent and provide retribution for victims without resorting to the death penalty.
In conclusion, the issue of capital punishment is complex and multifaceted. While it may be argued that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to crime and provides justice for victims, it is also clear that it raises significant concerns about human rights. The right to life is fundamental, and there are serious concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the criminal justice system. In light of these concerns, it is important to carefully consider the use of capital punishment and whether it is truly necessary and justifiable in modern society.
