Carr is google making us stupid. Is Google Making Us Stupid? by Nicholas Carr 2022-12-16
Carr is google making us stupid Rating:
7,4/10
1734
reviews
In his 2008 article "Is Google Making Us Stupid?", Nicholas Carr argues that the internet and specifically search engines like Google are rewiring our brains and making us less able to focus and think deeply. He cites several studies that suggest that the constant multitasking and information overload of the internet age is leading to a decline in deep reading and critical thinking skills.
Carr points out that the internet has greatly expanded our access to information and made it easier for us to find answers to our questions. However, he argues that this ease of access has led us to rely on the internet as a crutch, rather than using it as a tool to supplement our own knowledge and understanding. He cites studies that show that people who use the internet frequently tend to have shorter attention spans and are more prone to distractions.
Carr also argues that the internet is changing the way we process information. With search engines like Google, we can find information quickly and easily, but we may not be taking the time to critically analyze or synthesize that information. We may also be more likely to rely on shallow, surface-level information rather than digging deeper and engaging with more complex ideas.
Overall, Carr's argument is that the internet and specifically search engines like Google are making us less able to focus and think deeply, and that this is having negative consequences for our ability to understand and process complex ideas. While the internet has certainly expanded our access to information and made it easier for us to find answers, it is important that we also make an effort to engage with that information critically and to maintain our ability to think deeply and focus.
Is Google Making Us Stupid? by Nicholas Carr
. Nicholas Carr is the author of the Pulitzer Prize finalist The Shallows, the best-selling The Big Switch, and Does IT Matter? He compares the Internet with industrial management systems, tracing how they caused workers to complain that they felt like automata after the implementation of Carr ends his essay by tracing the roots of the skeptic trend. Some of the bloggers I follow have also begun mentioning the phenomenon. I can complete tasks at a faster rate and with a greater degree of precision. To illustrate this point, I have personally interacted with podcast. Carr discusses how concentration might be impaired by Internet usage. Carr believes that with the Internet now becoming a universal medium for uploading and downloading data, a new reading style has emerged.
Critical Response on "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr: [Essay Example], 876 words GradesFixer
First, and foremost, when reading a lengthy article, I prefer not having to search what every other word means. Some of the activities I engaged in were things like walking, exercising as well as using the computer. Get Help With Your Essay If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help! Carr also mentions that reading a text is not the right kind of reading, so it is not so good. Cultural experiences are a part of our education. Now I zip along the surface like a guy on a Jet Ski.
As part of the five-year research program, the scholars examined computer logs documenting the behavior of visitors to two popular research sites, one operated by the British Library and one by a U. Several prominent scientists working in the field of The Atlantic in which he reiterated that the brain was "very plastic" — referring to the changes that occur in the organization of the brain as a result of experience. He started with his personal experience that served as a way to connect with his readers. My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles. As much as I hate to admit it, he is correct in saying that while Google has made my life easier, it has made thinking harder. I have simply been clicking on anything of interest to me repeatedly.
An Analysis of Nicholas Carr's "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" Essay Example
It now feels like I have been spoon-fed all the information that it thinks I want to get. His ethos is focused on connecting with the reader by using the movie scene, which in the end was highly ineffective due to the fact that the movie is fictional and in no way could possibly become a reality. The influence of electronic media is that it makes the creator focus on the message. Lastly, Carr revisits the 2001: A Space Odyssey scene he used to open the article. Due to the topic at hand, the writers used the appeal to logic. The Internet, in his opinion, is just another kind of environment that we will uniquely adapt to. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
Carr uses some powerful arguments to prove that the internet is making us lazy, I agree with this point. Contrary to what we think, brain researchers have discovered that the grown-up mind is almost like plastic — nerve cells routinely break at the same time that it creates new ones, doing away with old connections and essentially making functional adjustments as it experiences or downloads information. Perhaps for someone of the older generation, the internet is too vast to handle properly. When teaching an older person to use a computer, I have noticed that the learner is very slow to move the cursor and is slow in processing the information. The only what online platform is actually doing is assisting us in reclaiming our lost learning legacy through a faster exchange of information and ideas in a social environment. Instead, it led to an increase. This is not based on science.
Overall, I believe that his argument is not effective because of his choice of sources, and also his tone of voice throughout his article. Reading online for me now consists of going for the article with the catchiest title, only to realize a few paragraphs in that it was all just clickbait. James Olds, a professor of neuroscience who directs the Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study at George Mason University, says that even the adult mind "is very plastic. I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I need to exercise my brain to think again, and not merely process.
However, he thought both arguments relied too much on determinism: Carr in thinking that an over-reliance on internet tools will inevitably cause the brain to atrophy, and Cascio in thinking that getting smarter is the necessary outcome of the evolutionary pressures he describes. If I do a critical analysis of my Google and social media feeds these days, the first observation I will make is how the ads on my feed seem to be perfectly tailored to me. I think we need to remember that we are smart people and that we have always been wired to survive and thrive without the speed of a search engine. When I read a long, complex argument, I find it difficult to break it into pieces. Interesting facts Google has had a pet-friendly office since the beginning. Yet, this is almost exactly the same argument that Carr is making against the internet.
The Internet, in his opinion, is just another kind of environment that we will uniquely adapt to. We have stopped enjoying the process of gaining new knowledge and percolating ideas out of them without getting distracted. MLA In-text: The Internet… Carr. At the end of the day, we find ourselves not changed in any way by the net. Though Google and other knowledge-finding and knowledge-building technologies might speed up existing human computational processes, they might also foreclose the human potential to easily create new knowledge. Retrieved 4 February 2016. The Internet also increases the speed of getting news, information.
By examining the human brain and comparing it to a computer, the author suggests that the Internet is slowly taking control over us and making us into robots. However, I think it is depended on which person. Experiments demonstrate that readers of ideograms, such as the Chinese, develop a mental circuitry for reading that is very different from the circuitry found in those of us whose written language employs an alphabet. Through email, twitter these communication methods, users can have 36 dialogs simultaneously but not focus on any of these. This allows for a student to learn more about particular subjects, giving them more knowledge faster, and making them less stupid. So, yes, you should be skeptical of my skepticism. Carr comes off as a nostalgic in his article, and misses the point that the internet has not ruined our abilities for creative input or deep thinking, but rather the internet has become a new modicum and template for personal expression.
