Disadvantages of rigid constitution. Advantages and disadvantages of Rigid constitution. 2022-12-27

Disadvantages of rigid constitution Rating: 9,2/10 182 reviews

A rigid constitution is a type of constitution that is difficult or impossible to amend. This means that any changes to the constitution must go through a highly formalized and often lengthy process, and may require the approval of a supermajority of lawmakers or a national referendum. While there are some benefits to having a rigid constitution, there are also several disadvantages that should be considered.

One disadvantage of a rigid constitution is that it can be inflexible and unable to adapt to changing circumstances. Constitutions are meant to serve as the foundation of a country's political and legal systems, and they should be able to adapt to changing societal and political conditions. However, if a constitution is rigid and difficult to amend, it may be unable to keep pace with changes in society and may become outdated or irrelevant. This can lead to conflict and frustration within the political system, as well as a lack of legitimacy for the constitution itself.

Another disadvantage of a rigid constitution is that it can hinder the ability of the government to respond to crises and emergencies. In times of crisis, it is often necessary for the government to take swift and decisive action in order to address the problem. However, if the constitution is rigid and difficult to amend, the government may be unable to respond as quickly as necessary, leading to further problems and potential harm to the population.

A third disadvantage of a rigid constitution is that it can limit the ability of the government to address the needs and concerns of its citizens. Constitutions are meant to protect the rights and freedoms of the people, but they should also be responsive to their needs and concerns. If a constitution is rigid and difficult to amend, it may be unable to address the changing needs and concerns of the people, leading to discontent and a lack of trust in the political system.

In summary, while a rigid constitution may provide some stability and predictability, it can also be inflexible and unable to adapt to changing circumstances. It can hinder the government's ability to respond to crises and emergencies, and it can limit the ability of the government to address the needs and concerns of its citizens. These are all significant disadvantages that should be considered when deciding whether or not to adopt a rigid constitution.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of a constitution?

disadvantages of rigid constitution

Why some people are crying that the constitution be amended, some comfortable with its provisions. It is submitted by legal scholars that the ammendment procedure of a written constitution should not be too rigid, but reasonable with a sprinkling of justifiable safeguards to guard against frivolous, unjust and selfish amendments. The proximate cause of the rigidity or flexibility of a constitution is the amendment process. But the government would fail to take decisions if the country concerned has a rigid constitution. Put in a simple way, federalism is a system of government in which powers are shared between the federal or central government and its component units. The federal government will become weaker: Lastly, a federal system of government is disadvantageous because it produces a weaker federal or central government and a stronger component unit. Whereas, there may not be an ideal or desirable change of the constitution by the government in a flexible constitution.

Next

Constitution: Definition, Sources,Types, Advantages And Disadvantages: Government Lesson Note

disadvantages of rigid constitution

It gives no room for arbitrary or imperious changes to the law: If laws were so easy to change, chances are there could be a preponderance of bizarre and totally inconceivable laws made at the whims and caprice of a corrupt or incompetent ruler. Workers and officials of every level of government must be paid and maintained by the nation. A flexible constitution is a constitution which can easily be amended or changed without a cumbersome procedure. This type of constitution can easily be tempered with and may change easily. As a result, it is not possible for the government to interfere in the fundamental rights of the citizens or to curtail the power of the state governments.

Next

Advantages and Disadvantages of a Rigid constitution

disadvantages of rigid constitution

. It gets the respect of all as it cannot be easily abused. In those days, my political science teacher used to take her time to explain everything to the class. A significant disadvantage, however, is that controversies may arise due to different understandings of the usages and customs which form the fundamental provisions of the constitution. Coupled with this, citizens can also sue the government to ensure that it performs its governmental duties. In that article, i compare the advantages and disadvantages both a unitary and federal system of government.

Next

politicalscience

disadvantages of rigid constitution

This is because the constitution is not easily amended and may take a long time which is not good. Most rigid constitutions are written. However, a written constitution is not always rigid, but may be flexible and easy to amend. So, in this article we will be looking at the advantages and disadvantages of a federal system of government. It does not provide for flexibility.

Next

Advantages and Disadvantages of a Written Constitution

disadvantages of rigid constitution

The residual list includes chieftaincy affairs, motor parks and market stalls, local taxes collections, while the concurrent list contains issues such as education, agriculture, health services, road construction, etc. Such decrees are raw material for making a constitution. Three of them are however important because they have been used to run government. Rigid constitutions are expensive, time and energy consuming. As we continue, i will discuss the disadvantages of a written constitution. She hopes her contents meet your search.


Next

What are the merits and demerits of Rigid constitution?

disadvantages of rigid constitution

This exposes the constitution to judicial intervention. But for the unchangeable nature of a rigid constitution, quick decisions are not possible. Only heterogeneous states can practice federalism. It allows quick action: Since a flexible constitution is very easy to amend, the constitution actually allows quick action to be taken in the interest of the nation in time of emergency. It does not allay the fear of ethnic domination of the minority by the majority people or religion in a multi-ethnic country. Demerits: A rigid constitution does not allow free scope for growth and development.

Next

Advantages and Disadvantages of Federal System of Government

disadvantages of rigid constitution

Thanks for stopping by. Adaptation: A flexible constitution is easily adaptable to meet the changing social, economic and political needs and developments of a country. The Constitution protects individual freedom, places power in the hands of citizens, limits the power of the government and establishes a system of checks and balances. Duplicate of government: Some political scientists have argued that a federal system of government is not actually advantageous because it brings about an unnecessary duplication of the government which is also true. A rigid constitution cannot easily adapt itself to the changing social and economic conditions.


Next

Rigid Constitution: Definition, Advantages And Disadvantages

disadvantages of rigid constitution

Now that you have understood what federalism is, I will take my time to highlight some of the reasons why federalism has not yet been adopted many countries. The Constitution of India — Dr. Also read: Best science courses to study in the university 2020 It is easy to understand the content of the constitution Unlike an unwritten constitution where the rules are not contained in one document, it is often easier to interpret and understand the intention of the legislature Law Making body when the rules are contained in one document because reading all the sections of the constitution can help in interpretation of one section. This is defined as Advantages Or Merits Of Rigid Constitution 1. A federal system of government can not be practiced with an unwritten constitution because an unwritten constitution is not contained in one particular document. The procedure for Amending the constitution is usually cumbersome, expensive and time consuming whereas, a flexible constitution can be easily amended.

Next