Ecological indian. The Ecological Indian: Myth and History essays 2023-01-06
Ecological indian Rating:
5,2/10
802
reviews
Ecological Indian refers to the indigenous peoples of the Americas, particularly those in the United States and Canada, and their relationship with the environment. These indigenous peoples have a long history of living sustainably and in harmony with the natural world, and they have a deep understanding of the ecological systems in which they live.
One of the key characteristics of ecological Indian societies is their respect for the natural world and their belief in the interconnectedness of all living things. This respect is evident in the way they live their lives, as they rely on natural resources for their survival and make use of them in a sustainable manner. For example, many indigenous communities practice hunting and gathering in a way that ensures the long-term health of the ecosystem and the species they rely on for food.
In addition to their sustainable practices, indigenous peoples also have a rich spiritual and cultural relationship with the environment. Many indigenous cultures believe that the natural world is imbued with spiritual significance and that humans have a responsibility to care for it. This belief is reflected in the traditional stories, rituals, and practices of these communities, which often revolve around the natural world and the cycle of seasons.
Despite the many positive aspects of the ecological Indian way of life, indigenous communities have faced numerous challenges and injustices throughout history. Many of these challenges stem from the actions of non-indigenous peoples, who have often treated the land and resources of indigenous communities as commodities to be exploited rather than as sources of sustenance and spiritual nourishment.
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of respecting the rights and traditions of indigenous peoples, and of the value of their ecological knowledge and practices. This has led to a number of initiatives aimed at supporting and collaborating with indigenous communities, including efforts to protect their traditional lands and resources, and to recognize and support their sustainable practices.
Overall, the ecological Indian way of life offers valuable insights and lessons for contemporary societies. By embracing the respect for the natural world and the interconnectedness of all living things that is central to indigenous cultures, we can work towards a more sustainable and harmonious relationship with the environment.
Rethinking the "Ecological Indian": A Penobscot Precursor on JSTOR
If you check the records, as Krech has done, you will find the obvious answer: both. It strips off the garments of civilization and arrays him in the hunting shirt and the moccasin. I'm a little torn about this book. Some people might not be interested in ecology or enjoy outdoorsy activities or might not have had the opportunity to try; on the opposite side, it's very annoying when someone assumes I know outdoor survival and ecology stuff because I came with Mystical Indian Knowledge pre-installed instead of working hard to learn those skills. Krech points out that the Ecological Indian myth has its roots in two social trends.
With time, we will live here long enough to become the native people of this landscape. Certainly, without question, Krech presents a plethora of facts from virtually every point of view, such that some conclusions are just not possible. Beaver trade facilitated Indians in gaining kettles, guns, cloth, alcohol, etc. Grass would be trampled under foot and dust would arise, firewood would quickly be depleted and water polluted. If the first Avatar film seemed brazenly futuristic—a technologically audacious blockbuster that spoke some truth to power—its sequel seems mired in the past, with ideas no less retrograde. . But the Indians more often say that in the old days, things were much better.
Krech is skillful in connecting the history of the Ecological Indian to the broad, modern problems of globalization. I am pleased, partly because this made me realize how much of a better, faster, less intimidated, more savvy reader I am today than when I tried reading it three years ago. Krech has whole chapters on the buffalo, beaver, and deer. Still, they hunted with deep ritual appreciation, singing to the deer, "Awake, arise, stand up! Conclusion We need to look at the civilization of India according to geographical and ecological imperatives that are far more certain than historical speculation conditioned by simplistic ideas of ethnicity, linguistics or migrations. One can sit through the entire film without once being compelled to remember that today approximately 2 percent of people living in the United States identify as Native, more than a million of whom reside on reservations. As for being for nature preservation, natives do gravitate towards working to take care of the land, water and animals but there are those of us who do nothing for those things. Krech's delicate, non-confrontational writing makes the responses to this book even more surprising.
Beyond the “Ecological Indian”: Environmental Politics and Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Modern North America
We need to take a new ecological look at the Vedas, which so far has not been examined adequately ecologically but has been approached mainly according to linguistic, Marxist or Freudian concerns that easily miss the obvious geography or ecology of the text. The other main great river region for India is the basins of the Krishna and Godavari rivers in the southeast of India, particularly Andhra Pradesh. While I do think this author was biased he frequently discusses that historial accounts of native Americans are, without addressing his own account likely is as well k still enjoyed this book. They always used every part of the animals they hunted, the didn't overhunt, they didn't leave animals dead and unused, and they lived in perfect harmony with the land, keeping it in a virginal state. People Can Stop It. This same network of rivers was ideal for communication.
In fact, they had all kinds of their own ideas about how to relate to their resources--SURPRISE! Is it acceptable for a white passing person, as it may lead others to mimicry? Like my culture is somehow so sacred that non-natives dare not touch it, learn about it, speak about it, or interact with it. Martin's left academia, gone from Rutgers University to teach in an Indian prison in Alaska. Krech's well-researched and documented descriptions of Indian use of fire, land, buffalo, deer, and beaver stand in stark contrast to the romantic view of Native Americans living in harmony with nature, taking only what they needed. Second, Krech deals fairly with Christianity. Indians before didn't need to think of numbers and dates and times and facts and figures-or is that my own sense of prejudice descending on my reading of the text? To be clear, I am not criticizing a major motion picture for being insufficiently radical: I do not need to consume my political analysis with a bowl of popcorn. Environmentalism is no place for identity politics.
Ancient Indian History from an Ecological Perspective
Then it turns out to have great bearing on my intended research later in life--go figure. Very interesting and enlightening read. They want to cash in. This is, for instance, the way that The truth Krech determines is of course much more mixed than either the Ecological Indian myth of wise stewardship and respect or the other pole, Natives as abusers comparable to Europeans. Deloria argued in his touchstone work Playing Indian, Western romanticization of Native life has tended to go hand in hand with its desire to possess and exterminate it.
Avatar 2: The Way of Water is a valentine to the “ecological Indian” myth.
Please note: You do not have to be Indigenous to participate here, but we do prioritize the Indigenous voice. However, highly recommend googling Kimberly Tallbear's astute response to understand how the ideas in this book impact our historical moment. Together, the two spawned a sort of John Wayne self-image that Americans nurtured through to the 1970s. Before the end of the Ice Age north India was much drier and cooler in climate. This book offers a much more radical take on what we might learn from the history of the American Indian.
Ecological Indian Is a Myth: Neither criminals nor saints, early natives were simply human
And it was absolutely stunning to boot. It also occurs at an empirical level that builds on the accumulated knowledge that Native peoples have acquired through centuries or even millennia of habitation of the land. It's a way of avoiding all the messy realities of politics and resources and treaties and hidden violence and everything else that just conveniently melts away if a people simply can be handwaved into perfect unreal nonexistence. Because it's a sneaky way of inserting the idea that such people don't belong in the real world. For instance, it seems plausible that, in the conditions in which Natives developed their cultural understandings of animal populations, killing more really did increase birthrates this happens when you mow grass and in human populations when mortality due to disease and conflict are high.
