Ibn taymiyya against the greek logicians. Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek logicians (1993 edition) 2022-12-26
Ibn taymiyya against the greek logicians Rating:
6,7/10
1606
reviews
Ibn Taymiyya was a 13th century Islamic scholar and theologian who is known for his criticisms of the Greek logicians and their influence on Islamic thought. In his writings, he argued that the Greek logicians had a flawed understanding of the nature of reality and that their philosophical systems were incompatible with the teachings of Islam.
One of the main criticisms that Ibn Taymiyya had of the Greek logicians was that they relied too heavily on reason and logic, rather than on divine revelation, to understand the world. According to Ibn Taymiyya, this led them to make various errors and contradictions in their philosophical arguments. For example, he argued that the Greek logicians' concept of the "unmoved mover" - the idea that there must be an ultimate cause or first principle behind all things - was flawed because it relied on a logical argument rather than on divine revelation.
In addition, Ibn Taymiyya also criticized the Greek logicians for their emphasis on abstract concepts and their tendency to ignore the concrete, empirical world. He argued that their focus on abstract ideas and their reliance on logic and reason led them to neglect the importance of practical knowledge and the reality of everyday life.
Ibn Taymiyya also believed that the Greek logicians' philosophical systems were incompatible with the teachings of Islam. He argued that the Qur'an and the Hadith, which are the primary sources of Islamic teachings, contain a complete and comprehensive understanding of the nature of reality. Therefore, he believed that any philosophical system that went against the teachings of Islam was fundamentally flawed.
Overall, Ibn Taymiyya's criticisms of the Greek logicians reflect his belief that the pursuit of philosophical knowledge should be grounded in divine revelation and practical knowledge, rather than on abstract concepts and logical arguments. He argued that the Greek logicians' reliance on reason and logic led them to make various errors and contradictions in their philosophical arguments, and that their philosophical systems were incompatible with the teachings of Islam.
Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek logicians (1993 edition)
The work carries the insignia of Clarendon Press, Oxford is a further testimony of its enduring value. The richly documented biographical and bio-bibliographical accounts of ibn Taymiyya by contemporary and later biographers and historians enable us to understand both his declared and latent To read more about the Ibn Taymiyya Against The Greek Logicians book Click the download button below to get it for free. Advanced Searching Our Want to get more out of the basic search box? His argument is grounded in an empirical approach that in many respects prefigures the philosophies of the British empiricists. Taymiyya was originally from a small town on the border between Syria and Turkey, but he was forced to move around due to the Mongol invasions. Professor Hallaq's translation, with a substantial introduction and extensive notes, makes this important work available to a wider audience for the first time.
He writes: What is self-evident for someone may, without the need for definition, also become basic for another through means similar to those to which the former was exposed. Wildcard Searching If you want to search for multiple variations of a word, you can substitute a special symbol called a "wildcard" for one or more letters. But when the intellect is separated from individual particulars by a long lapse of time, it will commit frequent errors by formulating excessively general or unduly restrictive judgments. If your book is not available on EZBorrow, you can request it through ILLiad ebooks unavailable. Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them. He therefore set out to refute philosophical logic, a task which culminated in one of the most devastating attacks ever levelled against the logical system upheld by the early Greeks, the later commentators, and their Muslim followers.
blog.sigma-systems.com: Customer reviews: Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians
During that time, he was allowed visitors and held many philosophical discussions. The idea expressed here is that we know new particulars by analogy, that is, by associating the known ones with the not-known ones. In the Latin tradition, the most famous rejections of logic were produced by Humanist thinkers like Lorenzo Valla 1406-1457 and Joan Luis Vives 1492—1540. The 10 digit ISBN is 0198240430 and the 13 digit ISBN is 9780198240433. This books publish date is Nov 11, 1993.
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians (October 19, 1993 edition)
Bibliographic Details Main Author: Corporate Author: Other Authors: Format: Online Book Language: English Arabic Published: Oxford : 1993. He therefore set out to refute philosophical logic, a task which culminated in one of the most devastating attacks ever levelled against the logical system upheld by the early Greeks, the later commentators, and their Muslim followers. During his stay in Egypt, in 1309, he was imprisoned for a few months in Alexandria. Knowledge that the word signifies a meaning and that it was coined for that meaning presupposes the forming of a concept of that meaning. The text also presupposes quite a bit of knowledge of the theories that are being rejected. Ibn Taymiyya was a nominalist, and very critical of the realist metaphysics of Avicenna and his followers.
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians by ابن تيمية
Their critique, foremost, stands as a symbol for their rejection of a certain way of doing philosophy. EZBorrow is the easiest and fastest way to get the book you want ebooks unavailable. ترك ثروة علمية تدل على غزارة علمه وسعة اطلاعه، وتكامل إدراكه لأطراف ما يبحثه واستوائه لديه، ومن ذلك مسائل علم الكلام ومباحث الفلسفة، فهو يناقش المتكلمين والفلاسفة بأدلتهم، وينقد مناهجهم، ويبطل حججهم بثقة وعلم، ذكر ابن عبد الهادي أن مصنفاته وفتاواه ورسائله لا يمكن ضبط عددها، وأنه لا يَعلم أحدًا من متقدمي الأمة جمع مثل ما جمعه، وصنف نحو ما صنفه. Logicians: 12 This kind of argument is quite common in the text. There he apparently received some visitors whose identities we do not know but who had strong leanings toward philosophy Though his interest up till that time lay in confuting the metaphysical doctrines of the philosophers, he there made up his mind to write a refutation of logic, which he thought to be the ultimate source of the erroneous metaphysical doctrines espoused by the philosophers. For example, "World war II" with quotes will give more precise results than World war II without quotes. The introduction of Greek philosophy into the Muslim world left an indelible mark on Islamic intellectual history.
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians (9780198240433)
ففي محنته الأولى بمصر، صنف عدة كتب وهو بالسجن، استدل فيها بما احتاج إليه من الأحاديث والآثار، وذكر فيها أقوال المحدثين والفقهاء، وعزاها إلى قائليها بأسمائهم، كل ذلك بديهة اعتمادًا على حفظه، فلما روجعت لم يعثر فيها على خطأ ولا خلل. The introduction of Greek philosophy into the Muslim world left an indelible mark on Islamic intellectual history. This is a problem Taymiyya is fully aware of and which he exploits in his rejection of the theory of the syllogisms. Hence, even though we have knowledge of particulars there is a limit to our knowledge and we can never fully know something universally, which will be a serious problem for syllogistics and, particularly, for Aristotelian demonstrations, which are the syllogisms that produce scientific knowledge. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon.
However, Aristotelian metaphysics gave rise to doctrines about God and the universe that were found highly objectionable by a number of Muslim theologians, among whom the fourteenth-century scholar Ibn Taymiyya stood foremost. In another passage, he rejects so-called self-evident concepts, which supposedly do not need any definition, by an argument purporting to show that even such concepts are relative. Ibn Taymiyya is no skeptic, however, since he argues that we can attain knowledge, and that all knowledge starts with the observation of particular things. It was then that he began compiling a substantial refutation of logic, which he, as he tells us, had come to see as the main reason for the many errors in metaphysics among his fellow contemporary philosophers. Now, if we already have an apprehension of the meaning of the words used in the definition, then the definition seems not to add anything new - what is defined is already assumed. In a similar way, we can come to know universally, although he thinks full universality is impossible and unknowable, since we can never experience all the particulars, that is, he points to what we now call the problem of induction. You can also use ILLiad to request chapter scans and articles.
He therefore set out to refute philosophical logic, a task which culminated in one of the most devastating attacks ever levelled against the logical system upheld by the early Greeks, the later commentators, and their Muslim followers. His text is full of counter-arguments, some better than others, and they are often stated in condensed form, which makes them hard to understand. Book Summary: The title of this book is Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians. Unlike Ghazali, who rejected philosophical metaphysics but embraced logic, Ibn Taymiyya considered the two inextricably connected. The number of Ibn Taymeeyah's teachers exceeds two hundred.
Staff View: Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek logicians / :: Library Catalog Search
His argument is grounded in an empirical approach that in many respects prefigures the philosophies of the British empiricists. Ibn Taymiyya instead argues that even though it is a perfectly valid argument, it is useless, since it does not lead to any new knowledge. Qadi remembered with pride that it was he who had first permitted an intelligent and learned man like Ibn Taimiyah to give Fatwa. R4 049 a PVUM 100 1 a Ibn Taymåiyah, Aòhmad ibn °Abd al-òHalåim, d 1263-1328. Logicians: 256 The universal premise assumed in a demonstrative syllogism can never be true without a complete induction and that is impossible. When he was thirty, he was offered the office of Chief Justice, but refused, as he could not persuade himself to follow the limitations imposed by the authorities.
Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians by Wael B. Hallaq, Hardcover
He lived for many years in Egypt before returning to Damascus towards the end of his life. He seems not to have been a hugely influential scholar during his lifetime, but in recent years his religious thinking has seen a great revival and he is perhaps the most influential Medieval Islamic scholar today. His argument is grounded in an empirical approach that in many respects prefigures the philosophies of the British empiricists. Editorial Reviews "A competent and readable translation of a key text of Islamic civilization. Philosophical discourse became a constant element in even traditionalist Islamic sciences. This particular edition is in a Hardcover format.
