The patriarchal theory of the origin of the state is a sociological theory that suggests that the state arose from a patriarchal, authoritarian system in which men held a monopoly on political power and used it to dominate and control women and other subordinates. This theory is based on the idea that the state originated as a means of protecting and preserving the interests of the ruling elite, who were predominantly men, and that this has continued to be a key feature of the state throughout history.
According to this theory, the state arose as a way for men to exert control over their families, communities, and societies. It is believed that men were able to do this by monopolizing the means of violence and coercion, such as armies and police forces, and by establishing a system of laws and rules that supported their dominance. The state was therefore seen as a tool that men used to maintain their power and control over others, especially women.
The patriarchal theory of the origin of the state is often associated with sociological theories that emphasize the role of power and control in shaping social relations and institutions. It is argued that the state emerged as a way for men to exercise their power over others and to maintain their dominance in society. This theory suggests that the state has always been shaped by the interests and needs of the ruling elite, and that it has been used as a tool to maintain their power and control.
Critics of the patriarchal theory of the origin of the state argue that it oversimplifies the complex and varied histories of states and societies. They point out that the state has often served a range of functions beyond simply maintaining the dominance of the ruling elite, such as providing public goods and services, regulating economic activity, and protecting the rights of citizens. Additionally, some argue that the state has often been used as a means of promoting social justice and equality, rather than simply preserving the interests of the ruling elite.
Despite these criticisms, the patriarchal theory of the origin of the state remains a significant and influential sociological theory, and it continues to be debated and discussed by scholars and researchers in the field. Ultimately, the role and purpose of the state is a complex and multifaceted issue that has been shaped by a range of historical, political, and cultural factors, and will likely continue to evolve and change over time.
[PDF Notes] Four valid criticism against Patriarchal theory regarding the origin of the State 2023
We are, thus, told, Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. One totem group men were to marry all the women of another totem group. In other words the descent was traced through the father and not the mother. All were ordained to submit to his authority, and disobedience to his I command a sin for which there was divine punishment. The ruler was a divinely appointed agent, and he was responsible for his actions to God alone, whose Deputy the ruler was. The need to protect the law, in the end, forced the historical humans into conformity with the layout of the status.
Patriarchal Theory
There are many theories that reveal the process of the origin and evolution of the state. First, the theory dashed to the ground the more worthless theory that the state was the creation of God. Vardhamana Mahavira who founded Jainism, and Gautama Buddha, who founded Buddhism, belonged to the kshatriya clan, and both disputed the authority of the Brahmanas. Society and the state are inextricably linked, so studying the latter should be as detailed as possible. Evaluation of the Theory. In such circumstances, kinship and paternity could not be established, but maternity was established. The emergence of the social contract theory which held the wishes of the people in high halo dwarfed the godly wishes in the creation of the state.
Patriarchal theory of origin of state
There is however a great controversy as to who was the head of the family, the father or the mother and from where the decent was traced in the primitive society Some believe that a patriarchal family was the earliest social unit while others contend that a matriarchal family was the primary social organization. God will judge a bad King, but he must be judged by his subjects Or by any human agency for enforcing the law, such as the estates or the courts. Because, family is the oldest of all human institutions and because family is the first constituent of society, it has played a dominant role in the organisation of State. He says,"In the family,the primary social unit, there are always present the curbs and controls that constitute the essence of government, which is in continuation by the more inclusive society of a process of regulation that is highly developed within the family. The Italian Marxist, Antonio Gramsci made a little departure from the Marxist tenet by stating that a state is the creation of the political party that holds on power. According to this concept, the aim of every person is to attain four noble ends or Purusharthas.
Notes on Matriarchal Theory regarding the origin of the State
The supporters of this theory say that the state is nothing but an expansion of the family. According to Sir Henry Maine, there was nothing more worthless than the social contract theory as an explanation of the origin of the state. Patriarchal Theory According to Patriarchal Theory, the eldest male descendant of the family played a significant role in the formation and development of the state. . As men are children of God, so are men children of the King, and they owe him equal obedience; without a King, there could be no civil society, as the people were a mere heedless multitude incapable of making laws.
