Shakespeare in the bush analysis. Analysis of the story "Shakespeare in the bush" Free Essay Example 2022-12-15
Shakespeare in the bush analysis Rating:
5,7/10
1540
reviews
Shakespeare in the Bush is a fascinating account of anthropologist Laura Bohannan's attempt to explain the story of Hamlet to the Tiv people of Nigeria. Through this experience, Bohannan discovers that cultural differences can greatly impact the way in which a story is interpreted and understood.
One of the most striking aspects of Shakespeare in the Bush is the way in which the Tiv people struggle to understand the motivations of the characters in Hamlet. For example, they are perplexed by the character of Hamlet, who they see as unnecessarily hesitant and indecisive. They also struggle to understand why he would want to avenge his father's death, as they view the concept of individual revenge as being in conflict with their own cultural values of community harmony and reconciliation.
Another interesting aspect of the Tiv interpretation of Hamlet is their emphasis on the supernatural elements of the play. They view the ghost of Hamlet's father as a real, tangible being and believe that it is responsible for causing the chaos and turmoil in the story. This is in contrast to the Western interpretation of the ghost as a metaphor for Hamlet's inner turmoil and indecision.
Ultimately, Bohannan's experience in Shakespeare in the Bush serves as a reminder of the importance of cultural context in understanding literature. It shows that the same story can be interpreted in very different ways depending on the cultural background of the audience. This is something that is often overlooked in Western society, where we tend to assume that our own cultural values and beliefs are universal.
In conclusion, Shakespeare in the Bush is a thought-provoking and enlightening account of the ways in which cultural differences can impact the interpretation of literature. It serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding and respecting the cultural context of the stories we read and share.
Analysis Of The Story Shakespeare In The Bush Case Study Solution and Analysis of Harvard Case Studies
Her friend gave her a copy of During her stay with the Tiv in Africa, Bohannan gets a chance to relay the story of Hamlet to the tribe. The Tiv elders had many explanations for the behavior of Hamlet, which held the authors interest. The argument remained a stalemate as she was preparing to travel to Africa. Right now, I mainly see a lot of repetition and metaphors in music. STEP 9: Selection Of Alternatives For Analysis Of The Story Shakespeare In The Bush Case Solution: It is very important to select the alternatives and then evaluate the best one as the company have limited choices and constraints.
Another problem she encountered while reading and telling the text was her opposing interpretation of the book, as compared to that of the elders. According to the elder, Laertes had bewitched his sister to find a way to promote her physique to the witches. He had many fines to pay for fighting, and debts from gambling. Using an object to compare it to another defines a metaphor. Martin Luther King, for example, uses metaphors to show detail when he talks about little girls not being able to go and play on the playground with other white children. A wife of one of the elders overheard this part of the story and explained that a quick remarriage is ideal.
Through out this story you can see that human nature does plays no part in the Tivs interpretations of Hamlet. This method no one would no that the king arranged Hamlets demise. One was to marry off to his sister at once, but it is difficult to find a man who will marry a woman desired by the son of the chief. But when I read to the middle of the article, I realized that it is something about the impact of culture on interpreting a story. Bohannan repeatedly began defending her interpretation of Hamlet the instant an elder began giving ideas that were contrasting towards her own. The beginning introduces Bohannan's objective of her trip, and some interesting background stories of the African Tribe Tiv and shocking behavior from the elders, shocked by the fact of that they have beer down there. The Author protested to this by saying that the body was in fact buried and Laertes had jumped into the grave and was followed by Hamlet.
The poison beer that killed Hamlets mother was obviously meant for the winner of the fight. In the story Shakespeare in the Bush, author Laura Bohannan has an argument with a friend about the interpretation of Shakespeare 's literature. This strategy helps the company to make any strategy that would differentiate the company from competitors, so that the organization can compete successfully in the industry. What problems did Bohannan encounter as she told the story of Hamlet to the Tiv? Therefore Laertes had to take the second way: he killed his sister by witchcraft, drowning her so he could secretly sell her body to the witches. Once the alternatives have been generated, student should evaluate the options and select the appropriate and viable solution for the company. The author then argues that the plots and motivations of Shakespeare 's tragic plays will always be apparent because human nature is more or less universal through out the world.
Analysis of the story "Shakespeare in the bush" Free Essay Example
Bohannan had to agree with this although it may not have been exact; Laertes did wish to kill Hamlet. The Tiv are also known as the Mitshi, Munchi or Munshi. An insightful judge of characters, Feste is both impudent and witty at the same time, neither mincing his words nor masking his emotions. McAdams is a Personality Scientist and a Professor and Chair of the Department of Psychology at Northwestern University. Bohannan had to agree with this although it may not have been exact; Laertes did wish to kill Hamlet.
The Tiv had very different rationalizations for the plot progression and the character motives. Another method used to evaluate the alternatives are the list of pros and cons of each alternative and one who has more pros than cons and can be workable under organizational constraints. As is evident by the conclusion, justice prevails as usual and Macbeths demise is a result of his evil deeds. In his own eyes, the elder understood the meaning of the story correctly even though his thoughts did not match with the authors. This is evident from the introduction, whereby the author assumes that she is from a professional background while the people of the Tiv community are uneducated traditionalists. The Tiv 's perspective was that hamlet this matter should have never been brought to Hamlet 's attention. He said Laertes would be angry with this and try to kill Hamlet.
Shakespeare In The Bush By Laura Bohannan Analysis
Although these answers were not the same the author viewed she found them fascinating and she modeled the remaining parts of the story around them. The author learns that culture is the main reason for these differences of opinion. Her friend gives her a Hamlet as a parting gift with the hopes that she would find interpretation. In order to better grasp Hamlet's character traits, the monologues that reveal the inner activities is the most direct means of Shakespeare to shape typical kind of aesthetic effect. It is used for the purpose of identifying business opportunities and advance threat warning.
An Analysis of the Essay Shakespeare in the Bush by Laura Bohannan
Bohannon was learning that the Tiv culture and belief systems did not allow the storyline to progress in the same way as Shakespeare wrote it. It is said that case should be read two times. Allusions are also a very effective in this piece because it connects the real-life problems that the students are going through with things that everyone can understand. After introduction, problem statement is defined. The creator learns that culture is the principle purpose for these variations of opinion.
Why or why not? However, resources should also be perfectly non sustainable. Through out this story you presumably can see that human nature does plays no half within the Tivs interpretations of Hamlet. It was apparent to the Tiv woman that the mother had done this in the best pursuits of the household so Hamlet had no reason to feel negatively about it. A wife of one of the elders overheard this a half of the story and explained that a fast remarriage is right. Also, depending upon where someone is raised, the pronunciation of certain words can be different and therefore it influences the understanding. Right away the elder questioned this.
