The machine that won the war. Title: The Machine That Won the War 2022-12-16
The machine that won the war Rating:
6,1/10
757
reviews
The machine that won the war was a revolutionary piece of technology that changed the course of history. It was a highly advanced computer system that was capable of analyzing vast amounts of data and making decisions with lightning speed.
During the war, this machine was used to analyze battlefield tactics and strategies, helping to predict the movements of the enemy and choose the most effective course of action. It was also used to analyze logistics and supply chains, ensuring that the military had the resources it needed to keep fighting.
The machine was able to process information at an incredible rate, far faster than any human could. This allowed it to make decisions that were based on a much broader and more comprehensive understanding of the situation than any single person could have.
The machine was also able to operate continuously, without the need for rest or sleep. This made it an invaluable asset to the military, as it could work around the clock to provide vital intelligence and guidance.
The machine was not without its drawbacks, however. Its reliance on advanced technology made it vulnerable to cyber attacks, and there were concerns about its ability to make ethical decisions. Nevertheless, its contributions to the war effort were undeniable, and it played a crucial role in the ultimate victory.
Overall, the machine that won the war was a game-changing technology that revolutionized the way wars were fought. Its ability to analyze and process vast amounts of information quickly and accurately gave it a significant advantage over traditional military tactics and strategies. While it may have had its limitations, its impact on the outcome of the war was undeniable, and it will likely continue to shape the way wars are fought in the future.
The Machine That Won The War
This story leaves a feeling as if everyone can be evil… To portray this feeling the author uses three various types of irony; situational, dramatic and verbal. In the story, Henderson who is an excitable man, explained that the fact that Multivac was nothing more than a large machine, only capable of doing what it was programmed of doing. The three characters, Swift, Max, and Henderson, are developed almost equally in the story, and their role is practically the same; to alter the data either in or out of the Multivac Asimov, 1973. John Henderson, Multivac's Chief Programmer, admits that he altered the data being fed to Multivac, since the populace could not be trusted to report accurate information in the current situation. Prior to decimilisation 1968-1971 , UK books were priced in shillings, or shillings and pence, where 20 shillings equals one pound and 12 old pence equals one shilling. The story The Machine that Won the War does not have an outstanding protagonist. Any number after that is additional pence, usually 6 half a shilling but sometimes 3 or 9 a quarter of a shilling or three-quarters of a shilling.
Taken from his Nightfall and Other Stories collection the reader realises after reading the story that Asimov may be exploring the theme of doubt. The machine that won the war. Instead Henderson and Jablonsky worked in secret and allowed for Multivac to output the information that they thought was best. He may be suggesting that computers Multivac are not necessarily better than men and all that they really are is a machine that processes data that has been inputted and formatted by humans. Similarities share an important part in these two stories.
In the next couple of paragraph's, I am going to be explaining the themes of irony and conflict in the short story, The Machine That Won the War, by Isaac Asimov. A Soldiers must be able to trust each other during a war. He messed with the numbers until they looked right, and for this he feels ashamed. Vizzini and Huebner both attempt to clarify the representation of technology in The Iron Giant. Until Swift admits he did not rely on the data from the great Multivac, and instead used an older machine to decide what to do. Most of his senior technicians had been sent off to deal with other assignments and most of the assistants he relied on in later years were either too young to know much or too old to be familiar with the latest advances in the field.
See eNotes Ad-Free Start your 48-hour free trial to get access to more than 30,000 additional guides and more than 350,000 Homework Help questions answered by our experts. Differences in setting, place, and time can throw you off, but if you dig deep enough you might find that two very different stories might even be what I like to call "parallel opposites. However Asimov might be suggesting that regardless of how the war was won. As often happens at times of war. He now feels relieved that he had not completely relied on a computer which, it turns out, was not very reliable all along. Henderson's internal conflict between himself losing his job and wanting to keep it made him jingle with the programming until it seemed right. First, both author differs the way they introduce and develop their lead characters to the reader.
Swift wonders if Jablonski is jealous of the credit the machine is being given by the population of earth. La lectura de algunos es bastante estimulante y creo que en todos prevalece lo propiamente humano para resolver una dificultad o un problema. Early in the story, these lines or events suggest a wide range of possibilities to the audience. However the bigger question to ask is whether or not any of the three men and Multivac should have been allowed to make the required decisions in the war against the Denebians. Thus Jablonsky didn't win the war and Henderson's efforts were done in vain. Off to the right he heard it, and his ears, expert in such matters could not be mistaken.
Therefore, the three of them are protagonists. The three protagonists are careful since they were cautious with the data they gave or got from the computer Asimov, 1973. Particularly when human information is being feed into the computer. Something that becomes clear to the reader at the end of the story. Shillings were indicated with a variety of suffixes, e. The second is the date of publication online or last modification online.
He reveals that Multivac never really functioned in a totally reliable way and that his staff was not experienced enough to help him during the final years of the war. However the audience is not disappointed because Doug eventually lights a fire in the toilet and burns down the theatre. Foreshadowing is often used to predict death or fortune and can be valuable for the reader 's comprehension. Also, the three are secretive since they kept their alteration of data secret until the end of the war. These three men are presumablyacquaintedas they sat together and discussed their roles in the war.
Furthermore, this setting engendered myriad of science fiction films with violent extraterrestrial creatures, representing foreign nations, attacking our nation, signifying the fear of national security Vizzini 38. What a wonderful phrase! He therefore put no faith in its conclusions and, like Henderson, used his intuition to correct the results. Any number after that is additional pence, usually 6 half a shilling but sometimes 3 or 9 a quarter of a shilling or three-quarters of a shilling. He could never quite know how reliable such advice would be. At first, Swift says that the Multivac won the war, but the generals made all of the decisions and they won the war. Jablonsky like Henderson makes minor adjustments to the information based on intuition and Swift takes a risk between only two options heads or tails.
The three men, Lamar Swift, John Henderson, and Max Joblonski are having a conversation on their victory in the war. Prior to decimilisation 1968-1971 , UK books were priced in shillings, or shillings and pence, where 20 shillings equals one pound and 12 old pence equals one shilling. Some critics might argue that Multivac because it was receiving corrected information form Henderson might have a responsibility in winning the war. White will make a mistake and something bad will happen. Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.
Short Story Analysis: The Machine That Won the War by Isaac Asimov
One story is from accounts of a very long ago, when people were god-fearing individuals and believed in a higher being that could save them from tragedy and desperation. It really is the risk-taking of Swift that decided matters. There are numerous novellas in the world of literature; some significant examples include Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck and A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens. B Humans struggle in trusting machines to make important decisions. He emphasizes that the chamber is silent to imply the situation of tranquillity that is present after the war.
